{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5","short_pith_number":"pith:55NMDJ4Z","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ef5ac1a7996b748df41804b21b6871075e58d0d2b17b31b8df29e651d1f5b9ea","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.04614","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LawGPT: A Chinese Legal Knowledge-Enhanced Large Language Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiang-Xin Shi, Lan-Zhe Guo, Peng-Xiao Song, Xiao-Wen Yang, Yi-Xuan Jin, Yu-Feng Li, Zhi Zhou","submitted_at":"2024-06-07T03:52:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs), including both proprietary and open-source models, have showcased remarkable capabilities in addressing a wide range of downstream tasks. Nonetheless, when it comes to practical Chinese legal tasks, these models fail to meet the actual requirements. Proprietary models do not ensure data privacy for sensitive legal cases, while open-source models demonstrate unsatisfactory performance due to their lack of legal knowledge. To address this problem, we introduce LawGPT, the first open-source model specifically designed for Chinese legal applications. LawGPT comprises "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.04614","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-07T03:52:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"0dcaa5744b1e3406c65922b1fc71828edd83bb45cdcfac1e67da2052c7d6e082","abstract_canon_sha256":"9f63d3137f0cb06a214aede7af1743f9457436660d138c7c767e5795d1232dfe"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.502108Z","signature_b64":"GPl4ftlTYoWej7Mr+JEeypxAwz6+2useB6H8sFLjL0bHPGf7AaTovRZQnJQPea8VwArh7LO8INeoCzcdrisXBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ef5ac1a7996b748df41804b21b6871075e58d0d2b17b31b8df29e651d1f5b9ea","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501695Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501695Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LawGPT: A Chinese Legal Knowledge-Enhanced Large Language Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiang-Xin Shi, Lan-Zhe Guo, Peng-Xiao Song, Xiao-Wen Yang, Yi-Xuan Jin, Yu-Feng Li, Zhi Zhou","submitted_at":"2024-06-07T03:52:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs), including both proprietary and open-source models, have showcased remarkable capabilities in addressing a wide range of downstream tasks. Nonetheless, when it comes to practical Chinese legal tasks, these models fail to meet the actual requirements. Proprietary models do not ensure data privacy for sensitive legal cases, while open-source models demonstrate unsatisfactory performance due to their lack of legal knowledge. To address this problem, we introduce LawGPT, the first open-source model specifically designed for Chinese legal applications. LawGPT comprises "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.04614","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.04614/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.04614","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.04614v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.04614","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"55NMDJ4ZNN2I","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"55NMDJ4Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.24901","citing_title":"LLM Evolution as an Industry-Scale Ecosystem: A Lifecycle Perspective on Continual Learning","ref_index":144,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.25920","citing_title":"Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10470","citing_title":"From Query to Counsel: Structured Reasoning with a Multi-Agent Framework and Dataset for Legal Consultation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08948","citing_title":"TaxPraBen: A Scalable Benchmark for Structured Evaluation of LLMs in Chinese Real-World Tax Practice","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/55NMDJ4Z"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/55NMDJ4Z","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.04614&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/55NMDJ4ZNN2I35AYASZBW2DRA5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:46.501750+00:00"}