{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY","short_pith_number":"pith:5BTKUGXO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e866aa1aee1ca48bbd96110a04a128c61f5bea32ce4703852d2d84b0e59daa50","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2306.14115","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal Rationalization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hengrui Cai, Tong Wu, Wenbo Zhang, Yong Cai, Yunlong Wang","submitted_at":"2023-06-25T03:34:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"With recent advances in natural language processing, rationalization becomes an essential self-explaining diagram to disentangle the black box by selecting a subset of input texts to account for the major variation in prediction. Yet, existing association-based approaches on rationalization cannot identify true rationales when two or more snippets are highly inter-correlated and thus provide a similar contribution to prediction accuracy, so-called spuriousness. To address this limitation, we novelly leverage two causal desiderata, non-spuriousness and efficiency, into rationalization from the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2306.14115","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2023-06-25T03:34:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL","stat.ME","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"9f4e4e966120911f6f394bbb3a53463a4d584a6b5a6b6db3ee07a3568f8fa341","abstract_canon_sha256":"fe470692830075504691a94f2a3046b59cf2ceffb0c8d5528654de456d81b4d9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.684169Z","signature_b64":"EWV2KKbGjKTqAqgWn6O6I5iOQYyoZsT1NnQSODxN5nXyPkS4UfLWJa8e/tYBCayVCIHvAw9D+jb23h5dRWuvDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e866aa1aee1ca48bbd96110a04a128c61f5bea32ce4703852d2d84b0e59daa50","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683743Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683743Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal Rationalization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hengrui Cai, Tong Wu, Wenbo Zhang, Yong Cai, Yunlong Wang","submitted_at":"2023-06-25T03:34:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"With recent advances in natural language processing, rationalization becomes an essential self-explaining diagram to disentangle the black box by selecting a subset of input texts to account for the major variation in prediction. Yet, existing association-based approaches on rationalization cannot identify true rationales when two or more snippets are highly inter-correlated and thus provide a similar contribution to prediction accuracy, so-called spuriousness. To address this limitation, we novelly leverage two causal desiderata, non-spuriousness and efficiency, into rationalization from the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2306.14115","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2306.14115/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2306.14115","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2306.14115v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.14115","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5BTKUGXODSSI","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5BTKUGXODSSIXPMW","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5BTKUGXO","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.02118","citing_title":"Adversarial Cooperative Rationalization: The Risk of Spurious Correlations in Even Clean Datasets","ref_index":66,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5BTKUGXO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5BTKUGXO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2306.14115&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5BTKUGXODSSIXPMWCEFAJIJIYY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:02.683803+00:00"}