{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO","short_pith_number":"pith:5C5N6CYF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e8badf0b058bce175eddccda949c8933a534f908ab434dadcff99ad547a2d1ac","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1304.1270","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The CMB asymmetry from inflation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"David H. Lyth","submitted_at":"2013-04-04T08:33:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Erickcek, Kamionkowski and Carroll proposed in 2008 that the dipole modulation of the CMB could be due to a very large scale perturbation of the field $\\phi$ causing the primordial curvature perturbation. We repeat their calculation using weaker assumptions and the current data. If $\\phi$ is the inflaton of {\\em any} single-field inflation with the attractor behaviour, the asymmetry is almosy certainly too small. If instead $\\phi$ is {\\em any} curvaton-type field (ie.\\ one with the canonical kinetic term and a negligible effect during inflation) the asymmetry can agree with observation if $|\\f"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1304.1270","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2013-04-04T08:33:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"dacdabe3c29c77758c43eb0b971666cb529cc9f01e3edeac7daa75174a0ec1ff","abstract_canon_sha256":"cdaeefa3311c5c1cbb0d7237dd212acce5068f1784876022be19ebe8bf9b471c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.180390Z","signature_b64":"6smh47WhfR5h8p7TC6Phf/DDKwJq98o0Nni54HYPHtsT/EbigSoEX/AE2yM7l7DAeu6T1vXkSa8Kuid+GK3dDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e8badf0b058bce175eddccda949c8933a534f908ab434dadcff99ad547a2d1ac","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.179944Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.179944Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The CMB asymmetry from inflation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"David H. Lyth","submitted_at":"2013-04-04T08:33:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Erickcek, Kamionkowski and Carroll proposed in 2008 that the dipole modulation of the CMB could be due to a very large scale perturbation of the field $\\phi$ causing the primordial curvature perturbation. We repeat their calculation using weaker assumptions and the current data. If $\\phi$ is the inflaton of {\\em any} single-field inflation with the attractor behaviour, the asymmetry is almosy certainly too small. If instead $\\phi$ is {\\em any} curvaton-type field (ie.\\ one with the canonical kinetic term and a negligible effect during inflation) the asymmetry can agree with observation if $|\\f"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1304.1270","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1304.1270","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.180008+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1304.1270v5","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.180008+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1304.1270","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.180008+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5C5N6CYFRPHB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:34.582898+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:34.582898+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5C5N6CYF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:34.582898+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.03729","citing_title":"Constraining Scale-Dependent Growth in $f(R)$ Gravity with Future 21 cm Surveys","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5C5N6CYF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5C5N6CYF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1304.1270&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5C5N6CYFRPHBOXW5ZTNJJHEJGO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.180008+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:50:43.180008+00:00"}