{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2007:5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4","short_pith_number":"pith:5EF6CQRA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e90be142206bbb99766c428ae973db873af680f79382f6385c53a5bb4ea49105","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0706.0502","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Relating two standard notions of secrecy","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Eugen Zalinescu, Michael Rusinovitch, Veronique Cortier","submitted_at":"2007-06-04T19:30:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Two styles of definitions are usually considered to express that a security protocol preserves the confidentiality of a data s. Reachability-based secrecy means that s should never be disclosed while equivalence-based secrecy states that two executions of a protocol with distinct instances for s should be indistinguishable to an attacker. Although the second formulation ensures a higher level of security and is closer to cryptographic notions of secrecy, decidability results and automatic tools have mainly focused on the first definition so far.\n  This paper initiates a systematic investigatio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0706.0502","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2007-06-04T19:30:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"808d334878f6c9529286d88eea7c3628d27a26f15a2edc7cf525f12367b7c736","abstract_canon_sha256":"792a0686d8f595ea87ef077efa72bb0bc37a2efe31162d99544c63b79b5cd834"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.750190Z","signature_b64":"X8AKpzCgDZvqhbJQcpjRuT1HCF9K1+Bco4uFdc2tMPRRS0P50CsY8qV0/GOSqy09YYSkpN2tCV8PlXpMghRfAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e90be142206bbb99766c428ae973db873af680f79382f6385c53a5bb4ea49105","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749669Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749669Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Relating two standard notions of secrecy","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Eugen Zalinescu, Michael Rusinovitch, Veronique Cortier","submitted_at":"2007-06-04T19:30:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Two styles of definitions are usually considered to express that a security protocol preserves the confidentiality of a data s. Reachability-based secrecy means that s should never be disclosed while equivalence-based secrecy states that two executions of a protocol with distinct instances for s should be indistinguishable to an attacker. Although the second formulation ensures a higher level of security and is closer to cryptographic notions of secrecy, decidability results and automatic tools have mainly focused on the first definition so far.\n  This paper initiates a systematic investigatio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0706.0502","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0706.0502","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749752+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0706.0502v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749752+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0706.0502","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749752+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5EF6CQRANO5Z","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:55.427421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:55.427421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5EF6CQRA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:55.427421+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5EF6CQRA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5EF6CQRA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0706.0502&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5EF6CQRANO5ZS5TMIKFOS463Q4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749752+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:42.749752+00:00"}