{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP","short_pith_number":"pith:5ETJWD3E","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e9269b0f643d0c633729e1e712659f4beea75595f57a26cc40f2ee02db210934","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1803.03226","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Physical qubit calibration on a directed acyclic graph","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Hartmut Neven, John M. Martinis, Julian Kelly, Matthew Neeley, Peter O'Malley","submitted_at":"2018-03-08T17:46:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"High-fidelity control of qubits requires precisely tuned control parameters. Typically, these parameters are found through a series of bootstrapped calibration experiments which successively acquire more accurate information about a physical qubit. However, optimal parameters are typically different between devices and can also drift in time, which begets the need for an efficient calibration strategy. Here, we introduce a framework to understand the relationship between calibrations as a directed graph. With this approach, calibration is reduced to a graph traversal problem that is automatabl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1803.03226","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2018-03-08T17:46:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ee431288f6cc7c1658d0396e57764c48404ff75ae821301efeaaf59e0047a25e","abstract_canon_sha256":"f4a5ec6fe479cf01a392fee4d9aabf27773f178c56dfe765373963cbafeda4d8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.057738Z","signature_b64":"DoIQekCAXB0b5RrnfMa3MAobmdwXaUFpHthgPoJmCyMX5FIomKBHmoCwF3LwlWs135jUM0dU9FxJsSrxAENxDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e9269b0f643d0c633729e1e712659f4beea75595f57a26cc40f2ee02db210934","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.056958Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.056958Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Physical qubit calibration on a directed acyclic graph","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Hartmut Neven, John M. Martinis, Julian Kelly, Matthew Neeley, Peter O'Malley","submitted_at":"2018-03-08T17:46:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"High-fidelity control of qubits requires precisely tuned control parameters. Typically, these parameters are found through a series of bootstrapped calibration experiments which successively acquire more accurate information about a physical qubit. However, optimal parameters are typically different between devices and can also drift in time, which begets the need for an efficient calibration strategy. Here, we introduce a framework to understand the relationship between calibrations as a directed graph. With this approach, calibration is reduced to a graph traversal problem that is automatabl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1803.03226","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1803.03226","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.057091+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1803.03226v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.057091+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1803.03226","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.057091+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5ETJWD3EHUGG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:08.215937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:08.215937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5ETJWD3E","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:08.215937+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.08555","citing_title":"Benchmarking Optimization Algorithms for Automated Calibration of Quantum Devices","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11860","citing_title":"Runtime Calibration as State-Trajectory Feedback Control in Quantum-Classical Workflows","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21458","citing_title":"HEOM-in-Calibration-Loop: Exposing Non-Markovian Bath Signatures That Markovian Calibration Elides in Superconducting-Qubit Tune-Up","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ETJWD3E"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ETJWD3E","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1803.03226&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5ETJWD3EHUGGGNZJ4HTREZM7JP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.057091+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:21:44.057091+00:00"}