{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245","short_pith_number":"pith:6B4NBEGT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f078d090d3e502874924de3a296ffae76b832c065c201fc7e5ae5bb424cf0c14","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1511.03376","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revisiting Differentially Private Hypothesis Tests for Categorical Data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Daniel Kifer, Jaewoo Lee, Yue Wang","submitted_at":"2015-11-11T03:36:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, we consider methods for performing hypothesis tests on data protected by a statistical disclosure control technology known as differential privacy. Previous approaches to differentially private hypothesis testing either perturbed the test statistic with random noise having large variance (and resulted in a significant loss of power) or added smaller amounts of noise directly to the data but failed to adjust the test in response to the added noise (resulting in biased, unreliable $p$-values). In this paper, we develop a variety of practical hypothesis tests that address these pro"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1511.03376","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2015-11-11T03:36:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"2cfadf30e85df0e7d04ad989a3d6a9607714e9072dfebaf8f2681b6b3e21846c","abstract_canon_sha256":"deeec98cdbb2d1edd6e91b0eb62bf8b4996dce351cdce9900f9b9bee2f63e66f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.571503Z","signature_b64":"TW47uQoFHsZGu+bGUXLHhnx4bI2vQNX07R+tIbLwWeLKgNSytyU6vEZL4CLZ7Akf5jPFgyVxvePcRuX/Vu8xCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f078d090d3e502874924de3a296ffae76b832c065c201fc7e5ae5bb424cf0c14","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.570921Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.570921Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting Differentially Private Hypothesis Tests for Categorical Data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Daniel Kifer, Jaewoo Lee, Yue Wang","submitted_at":"2015-11-11T03:36:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, we consider methods for performing hypothesis tests on data protected by a statistical disclosure control technology known as differential privacy. Previous approaches to differentially private hypothesis testing either perturbed the test statistic with random noise having large variance (and resulted in a significant loss of power) or added smaller amounts of noise directly to the data but failed to adjust the test in response to the added noise (resulting in biased, unreliable $p$-values). In this paper, we develop a variety of practical hypothesis tests that address these pro"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1511.03376","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1511.03376","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.571005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1511.03376v4","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.571005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1511.03376","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.571005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6B4NBEGT4UBI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:07.941421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:07.941421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6B4NBEGT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:07.941421+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.28952","citing_title":"Optimal Rates for Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing with E-values","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6B4NBEGT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6B4NBEGT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1511.03376&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6B4NBEGT4UBIOSJE3Y5CS37245/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.571005+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:28.571005+00:00"}