{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX","short_pith_number":"pith:6FISOPUT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f151273e93ef1e0b06ada8816c65175dfacdbd2e68055af79e2fcdf1adca9e2d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.04929","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Carlos Garc\\'ia-Garc\\'ia, Pedro G. Ferreira, William J. Wolf","submitted_at":"2025-02-07T13:49:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The recent evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI, in combination with other cosmological data, has generated significant interest in understanding the nature of dark energy and its underlying microphysics. However, interpreting these results critically depends on how dark energy is parameterized. This paper examines the robustness of conclusions about the viability of particular kinds of dynamical dark energy models to the choice of parameterization, focusing on four popular two-parameter models: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA),"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.04929","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2025-02-07T13:49:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"88789cf4a4356e99cb139e45170746f50f2eb22f544ae3c22661f00fff505e9d","abstract_canon_sha256":"5d961391ea8d4c68a42cf877e86d2a304f63db87cca4de502d40633aeb222fbd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170780Z","signature_b64":"ldKJZaU6gRRydhcndIMSE5PdR52Bl2FZFn9ThgtYtQEh3ByhPPfDa0wmpEmVtf4tqlE2aLbsCf8mADj5OVdIBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f151273e93ef1e0b06ada8816c65175dfacdbd2e68055af79e2fcdf1adca9e2d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170180Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170180Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Carlos Garc\\'ia-Garc\\'ia, Pedro G. Ferreira, William J. Wolf","submitted_at":"2025-02-07T13:49:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The recent evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI, in combination with other cosmological data, has generated significant interest in understanding the nature of dark energy and its underlying microphysics. However, interpreting these results critically depends on how dark energy is parameterized. This paper examines the robustness of conclusions about the viability of particular kinds of dynamical dark energy models to the choice of parameterization, focusing on four popular two-parameter models: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA),"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.04929","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.04929/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.04929","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.04929v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.04929","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6FISOPUT54PA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6FISOPUT54PAWBVN","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6FISOPUT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":18,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06774","citing_title":"Natural Phantom Dark Energy from a $\\mathbb{Z}_N$--Axion","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07777","citing_title":"The Status of Single Scalar Field Dark Energy","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07348","citing_title":"Present Day Cosmic Acceleration from SDSS and DESI BAO: A Call for Finer Tomography of the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey","ref_index":74,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17951","citing_title":"Data-Driven Discovery of a Simple Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy Parametrization","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05853","citing_title":"Reconstructing dark energy with fewer assumptions","ref_index":69,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05539","citing_title":"Dissipative Cosmology and the Nature of Dark Energy: Insights from Bulk Viscosity with DESI DR2 observations","ref_index":70,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01226","citing_title":"Intertwined Constraints in Extended Cosmologies: Dark Energy, Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation","ref_index":142,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01360","citing_title":"A short review on Quintom dark energy theory","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31324","citing_title":"Cosmological Viability of Exponential Infrared $f(T)$ Gravity","ref_index":91,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.11936","citing_title":"Probing dynamical dark energy with late-time data: Evidence, tensions, and the limits of the $w_0w_a$CDM framework","ref_index":204,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21456","citing_title":"Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy?","ref_index":144,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09660","citing_title":"Testing the consistency of cosmological models with multimessenger astronomy","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.24732","citing_title":"The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2","ref_index":115,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.03779","citing_title":"Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20757","citing_title":"Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 2. Constraints on Dark Energy, Spatial Curvature, and Neutrino Masses","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.26560","citing_title":"Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14743","citing_title":"Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements","ref_index":102,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09660","citing_title":"Testing the consistency of cosmological models with multimessenger astronomy","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6FISOPUT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6FISOPUT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.04929&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6FISOPUT54PAWBVNVCAWYZIXLX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:03:03.170254+00:00"}