{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP","short_pith_number":"pith:6SCDB3PW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f48430edf684f6b5120d3cc423068853ca9fd14318e97dae96b3a50aacf96ae8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1506.03482","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Test Set Diameter: Quantifying the Diversity of Sets of Test Cases","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"David Clark, Robert Feldt, Shin Yoo, Simon Poulding","submitted_at":"2015-06-10T21:08:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common and natural intuition among software testers is that test cases need to differ if a software system is to be tested properly and its quality ensured. Consequently, much research has gone into formulating distance measures for how test cases, their inputs and/or their outputs differ. However, common to these proposals is that they are data type specific and/or calculate the diversity only between pairs of test inputs, traces or outputs.\n  We propose a new metric to measure the diversity of sets of tests: the test set diameter (TSDm). It extends our earlier, pairwise test diversity metr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1506.03482","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2015-06-10T21:08:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2e2514988a40cf033545dc1bfc6c78bf1ce50df13901c41efa167f7b7d7db057","abstract_canon_sha256":"ee0e81f969fc11ad4344279f6af4c04861ae8c2175b8544dae1bc40df6949193"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.069336Z","signature_b64":"UAYOu27hxGclIRb189C3w5jEokxWsqBWbYTOCA8EMfu7pwQNT/7pnr67ylME4eMVWyk1/C3CAJWc8s0KEy0uDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f48430edf684f6b5120d3cc423068853ca9fd14318e97dae96b3a50aacf96ae8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068942Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068942Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Test Set Diameter: Quantifying the Diversity of Sets of Test Cases","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"David Clark, Robert Feldt, Shin Yoo, Simon Poulding","submitted_at":"2015-06-10T21:08:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common and natural intuition among software testers is that test cases need to differ if a software system is to be tested properly and its quality ensured. Consequently, much research has gone into formulating distance measures for how test cases, their inputs and/or their outputs differ. However, common to these proposals is that they are data type specific and/or calculate the diversity only between pairs of test inputs, traces or outputs.\n  We propose a new metric to measure the diversity of sets of tests: the test set diameter (TSDm). It extends our earlier, pairwise test diversity metr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1506.03482","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1506.03482/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1506.03482","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1506.03482v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1506.03482","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6SCDB3PWQT3L","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQN","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6SCDB3PW","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.13480","citing_title":"Adaptive Testing for LLM-Based Applications: A Diversity-based Approach","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6SCDB3PW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6SCDB3PW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1506.03482&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6SCDB3PWQT3LKEQNHTCCGBUIKP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:57:21.068997+00:00"}