{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ","short_pith_number":"pith:6WMSIHIX","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14371","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:49:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"63adf7ec10713f80148bf4043671ec80701f07b82e43cd994322a2339be30969","abstract_canon_sha256":"9fd20e50d48b971cd698055b6d780c4eece4e4a4bc6afd242ecc9333e9b85de3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"f599241d17c8b556102278942f0a1902440f1c92262d5a4fb6f800e59bd2cac9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.14371","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14371","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14371v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14371","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6WMSIHIXZC2V","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6WMSIHIX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14371","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:49:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"63adf7ec10713f80148bf4043671ec80701f07b82e43cd994322a2339be30969","abstract_canon_sha256":"9fd20e50d48b971cd698055b6d780c4eece4e4a4bc6afd242ecc9333e9b85de3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"f599241d17c8b556102278942f0a1902440f1c92262d5a4fb6f800e59bd2cac9","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07.825329Z","signature_b64":"0QywwVc0BDgJcZ3hoGoBzqlGJZks/7udRKD5rS/6njJ+4fdxyweuRw3aYli9KY7df0Ba1dM+x93GX2f5YLcdDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f599241d17c8b556102278942f0a1902440f1c92262d5a4fb6f800e59bd2cac9","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07.824395Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07.824395Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.14371","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"rVoboCTLwsB5Cs552TQrGxAvfAOrbSVK84jCtxiGITohB7GslrXZHEqkSyhWYEcUbPF1Jdyr0vCFKZWIMI0/AA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-19T06:49:54.061666Z"},"content_sha256":"7c63bb9c452cfeb3ec89b2a0217e03ec7eec89bd5b6c3e9e62f5ccea52b5e71c","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:7c63bb9c452cfeb3ec89b2a0217e03ec7eec89bd5b6c3e9e62f5ccea52b5e71c"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Boundary null-controllability for the beam equation with classical structural damping","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"The damped beam equation reaches null state from the boundary for every damping strength up to 2 and for almost every strength above 2.","cross_cats":["math.AP"],"primary_cat":"math.OC","authors_text":"Julian Edward, Sergei Avdonin","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:49:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"Let $\\Delta$ be the Dirichlet Laplacian on the interval $(0,\\pi)$, and let $T>0$. We prove a well-posedness results for the structurally damped beam equation $$u_{tt}+\\Delta^2 u-\\rho \\Delta u_t=0, x\\in (0,\\pi),t>0$$ with various boundary conditions including $$ u(0,t)=u_{xx}(0,t)=0; u(\\pi,t)=f(t),u_{xx}(\\pi,t)=0, $$ and $f\\in H_0^2(0,T)$ and appropriate initial conditions. Viewing $f$ as a control, we prove null controllability for all $\\rho \\leq 2$. For $\\rho >2$, we show null controllability for arbitrary $T>0$ holds for almost all $\\rho$, but fails for a dense subset of $(2,\\infty)$.\n  An a"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We prove null controllability for all ρ ≤ 2. For ρ >2, we show null controllability for arbitrary T>0 holds for almost all ρ, but fails for a dense subset of (2,∞).","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The well-posedness of the damped beam equation under the specified boundary conditions and the validity of the controllability criteria (such as observability inequalities) for the given ranges of ρ.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Null controllability holds for the beam equation with structural damping ρ for all ρ ≤ 2 and almost all ρ > 2.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The damped beam equation reaches null state from the boundary for every damping strength up to 2 and for almost every strength above 2.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"9e165c2820666d8e46d8902638316b78797a6e09b8c613773e87f5ab80864a87"},"source":{"id":"2605.14371","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"599d82fb-b44b-46b6-9d15-6e0ae4a2577d","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T02:04:47.169926Z","strongest_claim":"We prove null controllability for all ρ ≤ 2. For ρ >2, we show null controllability for arbitrary T>0 holds for almost all ρ, but fails for a dense subset of (2,∞).","one_line_summary":"Null controllability holds for the beam equation with structural damping ρ for all ρ ≤ 2 and almost all ρ > 2.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The well-posedness of the damped beam equation under the specified boundary conditions and the validity of the controllability criteria (such as observability inequalities) for the given ranges of ρ.","pith_extraction_headline":"The damped beam equation reaches null state from the boundary for every damping strength up to 2 and for almost every strength above 2."},"references":{"count":25,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2003,"title":"G. Avalos and I. Lasiecka, ”Optimal blowup rates for the minimal energy null control of the strongly damped abstract wave equation”. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 2 (2003), no. 3, 601–616","work_id":"bc8135c6-bf25-4b9b-b74e-595884945a99","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2014,"title":"F. Ammar-Khodja, A. Benabdallah, M. Gonz´ alez-Burgos, L. de Teresa, Minimal time for the null controllability of parabolic systems: The effect of the condensation index ofcomplex sequences”, J. Funct","work_id":"6cba35b7-b20e-4d1c-81ef-bc65433d8872","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"Null-controllability for the beam equation with struc- tural damping","work_id":"a1bfe92f-02d7-4a28-93a4-efe1e2cf4323","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Null-controllability for the beam equation with frac- tional structural damping","work_id":"05fb1044-dfa3-462a-9b51-d852fd929697","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"In preparation","work_id":"daaf8c35-5cd4-44fc-9f2e-fd2d0b2c3212","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":25,"snapshot_sha256":"e0c90a90e1958db78f198785cc626d30c4e42fd7cf8a27e230e0143f173afbb8","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"599d82fb-b44b-46b6-9d15-6e0ae4a2577d"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"7Xyt/unP/b/Wbcqb2SYnnsh0/1Yo7ZkinjA9dEViiVhvsKEop/D52hUx4SERHCkLFNQUyet6HU+/ebLUiuHgAA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-19T06:49:54.062476Z"},"content_sha256":"e281a5290a47ca19faef75b8497c37712ac591d955833928ab38b5ffea90ed95","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:e281a5290a47ca19faef75b8497c37712ac591d955833928ab38b5ffea90ed95"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-19T06:49:54Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBCPCKC6CQZAJ","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"9fd20e50d48b971cd698055b6d780c4eece4e4a4bc6afd242ecc9333e9b85de3","cross_cats_sorted":["math.AP"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:49:29Z","title_canon_sha256":"63adf7ec10713f80148bf4043671ec80701f07b82e43cd994322a2339be30969"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.14371","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14371","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14371v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14371","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6WMSIHIXZC2V","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6WMSIHIXZC2VMEBC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6WMSIHIX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:e281a5290a47ca19faef75b8497c37712ac591d955833928ab38b5ffea90ed95","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"We prove null controllability for all ρ ≤ 2. For ρ >2, we show null controllability for arbitrary T>0 holds for almost all ρ, but fails for a dense subset of (2,∞)."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The well-posedness of the damped beam equation under the specified boundary conditions and the validity of the controllability criteria (such as observability inequalities) for the given ranges of ρ."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Null controllability holds for the beam equation with structural damping ρ for all ρ ≤ 2 and almost all ρ > 2."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The damped beam equation reaches null state from the boundary for every damping strength up to 2 and for almost every strength above 2."}],"snapshot_sha256":"9e165c2820666d8e46d8902638316b78797a6e09b8c613773e87f5ab80864a87"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Let $\\Delta$ be the Dirichlet Laplacian on the interval $(0,\\pi)$, and let $T>0$. We prove a well-posedness results for the structurally damped beam equation $$u_{tt}+\\Delta^2 u-\\rho \\Delta u_t=0, x\\in (0,\\pi),t>0$$ with various boundary conditions including $$ u(0,t)=u_{xx}(0,t)=0; u(\\pi,t)=f(t),u_{xx}(\\pi,t)=0, $$ and $f\\in H_0^2(0,T)$ and appropriate initial conditions. Viewing $f$ as a control, we prove null controllability for all $\\rho \\leq 2$. For $\\rho >2$, we show null controllability for arbitrary $T>0$ holds for almost all $\\rho$, but fails for a dense subset of $(2,\\infty)$.\n  An a","authors_text":"Julian Edward, Sergei Avdonin","cross_cats":["math.AP"],"headline":"The damped beam equation reaches null state from the boundary for every damping strength up to 2 and for almost every strength above 2.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:49:29Z","title":"Boundary null-controllability for the beam equation with classical structural damping"},"references":{"count":25,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":25,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"G. Avalos and I. Lasiecka, ”Optimal blowup rates for the minimal energy null control of the strongly damped abstract wave equation”. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 2 (2003), no. 3, 601–616","work_id":"bc8135c6-bf25-4b9b-b74e-595884945a99","year":2003},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"F. Ammar-Khodja, A. Benabdallah, M. Gonz´ alez-Burgos, L. de Teresa, Minimal time for the null controllability of parabolic systems: The effect of the condensation index ofcomplex sequences”, J. Funct","work_id":"6cba35b7-b20e-4d1c-81ef-bc65433d8872","year":2014},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Null-controllability for the beam equation with struc- tural damping","work_id":"a1bfe92f-02d7-4a28-93a4-efe1e2cf4323","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Null-controllability for the beam equation with frac- tional structural damping","work_id":"05fb1044-dfa3-462a-9b51-d852fd929697","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"In preparation","work_id":"daaf8c35-5cd4-44fc-9f2e-fd2d0b2c3212","year":null}],"snapshot_sha256":"e0c90a90e1958db78f198785cc626d30c4e42fd7cf8a27e230e0143f173afbb8"},"source":{"id":"2605.14371","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-15T02:04:47.169926Z","id":"599d82fb-b44b-46b6-9d15-6e0ae4a2577d","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Null controllability holds for the beam equation with structural damping ρ for all ρ ≤ 2 and almost all ρ > 2.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"The damped beam equation reaches null state from the boundary for every damping strength up to 2 and for almost every strength above 2.","strongest_claim":"We prove null controllability for all ρ ≤ 2. For ρ >2, we show null controllability for arbitrary T>0 holds for almost all ρ, but fails for a dense subset of (2,∞).","weakest_assumption":"The well-posedness of the damped beam equation under the specified boundary conditions and the validity of the controllability criteria (such as observability inequalities) for the given ranges of ρ."}},"verdict_id":"599d82fb-b44b-46b6-9d15-6e0ae4a2577d"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:7c63bb9c452cfeb3ec89b2a0217e03ec7eec89bd5b6c3e9e62f5ccea52b5e71c","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"9fd20e50d48b971cd698055b6d780c4eece4e4a4bc6afd242ecc9333e9b85de3","cross_cats_sorted":["math.AP"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:49:29Z","title_canon_sha256":"63adf7ec10713f80148bf4043671ec80701f07b82e43cd994322a2339be30969"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.14371","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"f599241d17c8b556102278942f0a1902440f1c92262d5a4fb6f800e59bd2cac9","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"f599241d17c8b556102278942f0a1902440f1c92262d5a4fb6f800e59bd2cac9","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07.824395Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07.824395Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"0QywwVc0BDgJcZ3hoGoBzqlGJZks/7udRKD5rS/6njJ+4fdxyweuRw3aYli9KY7df0Ba1dM+x93GX2f5YLcdDw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:07.825329Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.14371","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:7c63bb9c452cfeb3ec89b2a0217e03ec7eec89bd5b6c3e9e62f5ccea52b5e71c","sha256:e281a5290a47ca19faef75b8497c37712ac591d955833928ab38b5ffea90ed95"],"state_sha256":"0af8a01a6e98635c3ae98f95f28b5cdb65912e188c193ac147cfa855ed2ac950"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"B9XTIfuqFjMIsg0c80yy6y31/8hwlqfIdhXE9v9ID59PALCMqFZWPC5DYcamh3MpCN/6VsEa6ZFyL3S6NZHiCw==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-19T06:49:54.064770Z","bundle_sha256":"a393f34c679d2bc7da40ea1932b852b35f3b290594113cf3ea040a1238aabd37"}}