{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"427a480ba2389e9b4edbdec30091cbc6b81d58c4707fda2ca3fd9c32d07a9f50","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","submitted_at":"2026-03-16T18:13:53Z","title_canon_sha256":"d6b4253aea66f11d668361ff58183ac20f4378eeb89e7239491cdbfcdd485845"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2603.15788","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.15788","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.15788v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.15788","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7KMGEMZOTLEB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7KMGEMZO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:4d389b8a5bf075ecedc7a4656d85e63b5f72821d6ce65f70dfc86343a80ae2e3","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Among Kohn-Sham calculations, TPSS0 and QTP01 showed the best overall performance for dynamic polarizabilities. The best overall performance was obtained with O3LYP; however, the first eleven ranked functionals show very similar accuracy. Within the QTP family, QTP01 and LC-QTP provide the best results for C6 coefficients."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That EOM-CCSD provides a sufficiently accurate reference to rank functionals reliably, especially near excitation poles where the pole structure of CO was assessed and at the highest frequency where CC3 and EOM-CCSD differ."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients, with QTP01 and LC-QTP best within the QTP family and results close to EOM-CCSD."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients."}],"snapshot_sha256":"66e609ceaa1236c86df92b90d23f1c1f0ee34562a82cb524a7be7157908a992d"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"snapshot_sha256":"8fe15f200e37f0a01ab81eddc49067613c6377a8755bfef4be5e66ca4be45728"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"This work is the second in the series \"On the performance of QTP functionals applied to second-order response properties.\" In the first paper (J. Chem. Phys. 162, 054105, 2025), we demonstrated the good performance of Quantum Theory Project functionals in predicting static perturbed second-order properties, such as static polarizabilities, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin-spin coupling constants, and NMR chemical shifts. In the present study, we focus on frequency-dependent properties, namely dynamic polarizabilities and C$_6$ dispersion coefficients. For completeness, a total of 25 excha","authors_text":"Ajith Perera, Peter R. Franke, Rodney J. Bartlett, Rodrigo A. Mendes","cross_cats":[],"headline":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","submitted_at":"2026-03-16T18:13:53Z","title":"On the performance of QTP functionals applied to second-order response properties II: Dynamic polarizability and long-range C$_6$ coefficients"},"references":{"count":0,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":0,"sample":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2603.15788","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-15T09:50:11.987969Z","id":"1c3f71ae-ca42-4f9f-97b6-fafe0336480a","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients, with QTP01 and LC-QTP best within the QTP family and results close to EOM-CCSD.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients.","strongest_claim":"Among Kohn-Sham calculations, TPSS0 and QTP01 showed the best overall performance for dynamic polarizabilities. The best overall performance was obtained with O3LYP; however, the first eleven ranked functionals show very similar accuracy. Within the QTP family, QTP01 and LC-QTP provide the best results for C6 coefficients.","weakest_assumption":"That EOM-CCSD provides a sufficiently accurate reference to rank functionals reliably, especially near excitation poles where the pole structure of CO was assessed and at the highest frequency where CC3 and EOM-CCSD differ."}},"verdict_id":"1c3f71ae-ca42-4f9f-97b6-fafe0336480a"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:605dea9b1343eebe90e1356ee09194a84a29ac08b05f14c560fdacf0c88afd4d","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"427a480ba2389e9b4edbdec30091cbc6b81d58c4707fda2ca3fd9c32d07a9f50","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","submitted_at":"2026-03-16T18:13:53Z","title_canon_sha256":"d6b4253aea66f11d668361ff58183ac20f4378eeb89e7239491cdbfcdd485845"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2603.15788","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"canonical_sha256":"fa9862332e9ac81b11d7c04ce8c886d2d274c80798ca9352d931a651be37d693","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"fa9862332e9ac81b11d7c04ce8c886d2d274c80798ca9352d931a651be37d693","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444847Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444847Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"G/qHmvlhYCyx6sz7A5gSYCLVwwxeXkZqDxtUEhVF2fWirm/QraQgxjN24rB9gUCo4TfbCmSKOSlr3kZkqvpeDw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.445410Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2603.15788","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":2}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:605dea9b1343eebe90e1356ee09194a84a29ac08b05f14c560fdacf0c88afd4d","sha256:4d389b8a5bf075ecedc7a4656d85e63b5f72821d6ce65f70dfc86343a80ae2e3"],"state_sha256":"132e7e33858a987dab0fc5646ec99ae0f0b53e823e3c2fd4fd3baa8b71abfc5e"}