{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I","short_pith_number":"pith:7KPU5HDQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fa9f4e9c70cc0b34e67c1bda0a25c7da330cc314b2eea062510f6d81957b523b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1709.05272","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Economic Complexity: \"Buttarla in caciara\" vs a constructive approach","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Andrea Gabrielli, Andrea Tacchella, Andrea Zaccaria, Dario Mazzilli, Emanuele Pugliese, Luciano Pietronero, Matthieu Cristelli","submitted_at":"2017-09-15T15:36:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"This note is a contribution to the debate about the optimal algorithm for Economic Complexity that recently appeared on ArXiv [1, 2] . The authors of [2] eventually agree that the ECI+ algorithm [1] consists just in a renaming of the Fitness algorithm we introduced in 2012, as we explicitly showed in [3]. However, they omit any comment on the fact that their extensive numerical tests claimed to demonstrate that the same algorithm works well if they name it ECI+, but not if its name is Fitness. They should realize that this eliminates any credibility to their numerical methods and therefore als"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1709.05272","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.GN","submitted_at":"2017-09-15T15:36:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"4e4176c964a755f6acd68d2af260362622eeda6720b1cf4878ea5fd3c7b18264","abstract_canon_sha256":"a5563ff7ed1bc6b07dda01785854d5bc5ccbfb43353f1a2f3d18c83c7304fd1c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648792Z","signature_b64":"nxCh0HUoABaPvkwSV1yZlg//Sb+1JZYgxsMjE6ZesuuqKe2G4yW6mSMM4j/1XqabMjtGSXZD3cpTIeanB9qhAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fa9f4e9c70cc0b34e67c1bda0a25c7da330cc314b2eea062510f6d81957b523b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648438Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648438Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Economic Complexity: \"Buttarla in caciara\" vs a constructive approach","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Andrea Gabrielli, Andrea Tacchella, Andrea Zaccaria, Dario Mazzilli, Emanuele Pugliese, Luciano Pietronero, Matthieu Cristelli","submitted_at":"2017-09-15T15:36:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"This note is a contribution to the debate about the optimal algorithm for Economic Complexity that recently appeared on ArXiv [1, 2] . The authors of [2] eventually agree that the ECI+ algorithm [1] consists just in a renaming of the Fitness algorithm we introduced in 2012, as we explicitly showed in [3]. However, they omit any comment on the fact that their extensive numerical tests claimed to demonstrate that the same algorithm works well if they name it ECI+, but not if its name is Fitness. They should realize that this eliminates any credibility to their numerical methods and therefore als"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1709.05272","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1709.05272/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1709.05272","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1709.05272v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1709.05272","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7KPU5HDQZQFT","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7KPU5HDQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26966","citing_title":"Economic complexity at subnational level: A consistency analysis","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7KPU5HDQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7KPU5HDQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1709.05272&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7KPU5HDQZQFTJZT4DPNAUJOH3I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:02:52.648492+00:00"}