{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG","short_pith_number":"pith:7RXVH5G3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fc6f53f4dbe237a63131d9470c6100c9892914a83442f34adf3a15668cff28eb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2204.12462","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"GMM is Inadmissible Under Weak Identification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Anna Mikusheva, Isaiah Andrews","submitted_at":"2022-04-26T17:33:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider estimation in moment condition models and show that under any bound on identification strength, asymptotically admissible (i.e. undominated) estimators in a wide class of estimation problems must be uniformly continuous in the sample moment function. GMM estimators are in general discontinuous in the sample moments, and are thus inadmissible. We show, by contrast, that bagged, or bootstrap aggregated, GMM estimators as well as quasi-Bayes posterior means have superior continuity properties, while results in the literature imply that they are equivalent to GMM when identification is"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2204.12462","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2022-04-26T17:33:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c529dd6650a1af019d6fa6b75468049bbe7a2e68c52eb37248bd7e6ddfdf8beb","abstract_canon_sha256":"e2c921974f3493e4bac60f3c930a897e7d938ca165a13c121d68a902e6dd157d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804566Z","signature_b64":"NS3+Jl8Tx3Y6t4aIxHwrTpxA7XkhS1r5qlt8RwrAw4guO1vsqm03FL4DBdtJtiCc8WFRgM+ljkBJN5N8wTkxBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fc6f53f4dbe237a63131d9470c6100c9892914a83442f34adf3a15668cff28eb","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804096Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804096Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"GMM is Inadmissible Under Weak Identification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Anna Mikusheva, Isaiah Andrews","submitted_at":"2022-04-26T17:33:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider estimation in moment condition models and show that under any bound on identification strength, asymptotically admissible (i.e. undominated) estimators in a wide class of estimation problems must be uniformly continuous in the sample moment function. GMM estimators are in general discontinuous in the sample moments, and are thus inadmissible. We show, by contrast, that bagged, or bootstrap aggregated, GMM estimators as well as quasi-Bayes posterior means have superior continuity properties, while results in the literature imply that they are equivalent to GMM when identification is"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2204.12462","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2204.12462/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2204.12462","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2204.12462v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2204.12462","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7RXVH5G34I32","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7RXVH5G34I32MMJR","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7RXVH5G3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26638","citing_title":"Multivariable Mendelian randomization with weak instruments: a comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31930","citing_title":"Quasi-Bayesian Hierarchical Models","ref_index":76,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RXVH5G3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RXVH5G3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2204.12462&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7RXVH5G34I32MMJR3FDQYYIAZG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:08:37.804156+00:00"}