{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB","short_pith_number":"pith:ADYICHY2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"00f0811f1a1bcf8a14784f506c988478483fdfb6e827390b2646b8cf4aabea05","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.15895","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bias in LLMs as Annotators: The Effect of Party Cues on Labelling Decision by Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hunter Driggers, Sebastian Vallejo Vera","submitted_at":"2024-08-28T16:05:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Human coders are biased. We test similar biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) as annotators. By replicating an experiment run by Ennser-Jedenastik and Meyer (2018), we find evidence that LLMs use political information, and specifically party cues, to judge political statements. Not only do LLMs use relevant information to contextualize whether a statement is positive, negative, or neutral based on the party cue, they also reflect the biases of the human-generated data upon which they have been trained. We also find that unlike humans, who are only biased when faced with statements from extre"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.15895","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-08-28T16:05:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"1182d5fac30cb4bf23aa79eb4dd9071453d3d7d32ce36762f22f40ca85a86855","abstract_canon_sha256":"bb4fe42caba78adb635e816468602b903033a64da29b1f40bf1c392986590302"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.082017Z","signature_b64":"DEratQFxp3bpkDvNyK+SNl6I6CiSMBDCpnKg7mDoBs7dAzpT01oVpRYUA94o6ZF47Gg1zck6K/qSwluvahA5Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"00f0811f1a1bcf8a14784f506c988478483fdfb6e827390b2646b8cf4aabea05","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081583Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081583Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bias in LLMs as Annotators: The Effect of Party Cues on Labelling Decision by Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hunter Driggers, Sebastian Vallejo Vera","submitted_at":"2024-08-28T16:05:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Human coders are biased. We test similar biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) as annotators. By replicating an experiment run by Ennser-Jedenastik and Meyer (2018), we find evidence that LLMs use political information, and specifically party cues, to judge political statements. Not only do LLMs use relevant information to contextualize whether a statement is positive, negative, or neutral based on the party cue, they also reflect the biases of the human-generated data upon which they have been trained. We also find that unlike humans, who are only biased when faced with statements from extre"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.15895","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.15895/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.15895","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.15895v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.15895","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ADYICHY2DPHY","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ADYICHY2DPHYUFDY","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ADYICHY2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.18343","citing_title":"Hybrid Annotation for Propaganda Detection: Integrating LLM Pre-Annotations with Human Intelligence","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ADYICHY2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ADYICHY2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.15895&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ADYICHY2DPHYUFDYJ5IGZGEEPB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:19.081636+00:00"}