{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM","short_pith_number":"pith:ATYITZSZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"04f089e659f206fb9ad8ff8fe1544e6b18a7e3eadfc6ed33cfe2957ee9bf9645","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1607.03200","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Qualitative Judgement of Research Impact: Domain Taxonomy as a Fundamental Framework for Judgement of the Quality of Research","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Boris Mirkin, Fionn Murtagh, Michael Orlov","submitted_at":"2016-07-11T23:42:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The appeal of metric evaluation of research impact has attracted considerable interest in recent times. Although the public at large and administrative bodies are much interested in the idea, scientists and other researchers are much more cautious, insisting that metrics are but an auxiliary instrument to the qualitative peer-based judgement. The goal of this article is to propose availing of such a well positioned construct as domain taxonomy as a tool for directly assessing the scope and quality of research. We first show how taxonomies can be used to analyse the scope and perspectives of a "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1607.03200","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2016-07-11T23:42:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"fd70c782229ece1d8a57d7c7b830ae91ad0819b9276ada974dbfa09ec203ac19","abstract_canon_sha256":"7df0ebef1ae86690b4a297eff847c27df47a81aea564a71a878034e40491581e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.530526Z","signature_b64":"dzcDSgq6S7sqF4RUUOxPrE736yxl+p7pXC2XSGtfZ/UtB+IFn4VYtFSHOpqgdJVgSlMmO6B3U/LlaBKDUQmmBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"04f089e659f206fb9ad8ff8fe1544e6b18a7e3eadfc6ed33cfe2957ee9bf9645","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529870Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529870Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Qualitative Judgement of Research Impact: Domain Taxonomy as a Fundamental Framework for Judgement of the Quality of Research","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Boris Mirkin, Fionn Murtagh, Michael Orlov","submitted_at":"2016-07-11T23:42:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The appeal of metric evaluation of research impact has attracted considerable interest in recent times. Although the public at large and administrative bodies are much interested in the idea, scientists and other researchers are much more cautious, insisting that metrics are but an auxiliary instrument to the qualitative peer-based judgement. The goal of this article is to propose availing of such a well positioned construct as domain taxonomy as a tool for directly assessing the scope and quality of research. We first show how taxonomies can be used to analyse the scope and perspectives of a "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1607.03200","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1607.03200","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529963+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1607.03200v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529963+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1607.03200","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529963+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ATYITZSZ6IDP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:07.202191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:07.202191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ATYITZSZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:07.202191+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ATYITZSZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ATYITZSZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1607.03200&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ATYITZSZ6IDPXGWY76H6CVCONM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529963+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:19:04.529963+00:00"}