{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN","short_pith_number":"pith:B7CETGZP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0fc4499b2f5bc6a139ae2a5326e73c435339595b466778a5196c4a78a24641c7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2301.09043","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Execution","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Ge Li, Jiazheng Ding, Xue Jiang, Yihong Dong, Zhi Jin, Zhuo Li","submitted_at":"2023-01-22T02:59:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"A proper code evaluation metric (CEM) profoundly impacts the evolution of code generation, which is an important research field in NLP and software engineering. Prevailing match-based CEMs (e.g., BLEU, Accuracy, and CodeBLEU) suffer from two significant drawbacks. 1. They primarily measure the surface differences between codes without considering their functional equivalence. However, functional equivalence is pivotal in evaluating the effectiveness of code generation, as different codes can perform identical operations. 2. They are predominantly designed for the Ref-only input format. However"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2301.09043","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2023-01-22T02:59:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c4b0e97ed816270aa5a1a3d4a8351e583d4fb40b4ede7c274bd7c509d051a6fe","abstract_canon_sha256":"f3a62c51bf4cbd91903db7fd9fc6aa53d3e794cb555ebb27cc2103682036fa03"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.979105Z","signature_b64":"zf+Og5wTx+KSeuJ6lFx2wUVRH6DihuoeVLVOiXKwgtTd6Lo4yzaMkQ9Y7ZiTBvKLpSeeJtG3WyWrn7Weq/HVAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0fc4499b2f5bc6a139ae2a5326e73c435339595b466778a5196c4a78a24641c7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978593Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978593Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Execution","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Ge Li, Jiazheng Ding, Xue Jiang, Yihong Dong, Zhi Jin, Zhuo Li","submitted_at":"2023-01-22T02:59:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"A proper code evaluation metric (CEM) profoundly impacts the evolution of code generation, which is an important research field in NLP and software engineering. Prevailing match-based CEMs (e.g., BLEU, Accuracy, and CodeBLEU) suffer from two significant drawbacks. 1. They primarily measure the surface differences between codes without considering their functional equivalence. However, functional equivalence is pivotal in evaluating the effectiveness of code generation, as different codes can perform identical operations. 2. They are predominantly designed for the Ref-only input format. However"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2301.09043","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2301.09043/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2301.09043","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2301.09043v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2301.09043","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"B7CETGZPLPDK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"B7CETGZPLPDKCONO","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"B7CETGZP","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.18165","citing_title":"Saber: An Efficient Sampling with Adaptive Acceleration and Backtracking Enhanced Remasking for Diffusion Language Model","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.18471","citing_title":"CodeRL+: Improving Code Generation via Reinforcement with Execution Semantics Alignment","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2312.13010","citing_title":"AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2403.07974","citing_title":"LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/B7CETGZP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/B7CETGZP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2301.09043&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/B7CETGZPLPDKCONOFJJSNZZ4IN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:03:13.978659+00:00"}