{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB","short_pith_number":"pith:BNXXER3P","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0b6f72476f852b593d0d01f3224090a07c6de8b5f499eff3e7599eeb364e486d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.03166","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Assessing the dynamical assumptions in Tsirelson inequality tests of non-classicality in harmonic oscillators","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Quantum analysis shows uniform precession holds closely enough in harmonic oscillators that Tsirelson violations require quantum interference terms.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Arush Garg, Jonathan Halliwell, Taejas Venkataraman","submitted_at":"2025-09-03T09:33:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"\"Macrorealism\" posits that a system possesses definite properties at all times and that we can discover these properties, in principle, without disturbing the system's subsequent behaviour. The Leggett-Garg inequalities are derived under these assumptions and are readily violated by standard quantum mechanics, thereby providing a scheme to test whether demonstrably macroscopic systems can exhibit quantum coherence. Unfortunately, Leggett-Garg tests suffer from the difficult to avoid clumsiness loophole - the difficulty of proving that sequential measurements have not inadvertently disturbed th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.03166","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2025-09-03T09:33:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ec5ac7693efa1247e3d05b5c94333170b53a761899caad38598e21a2880c7209","abstract_canon_sha256":"9edb27dd6d1422a7562d38ad8829bc5935e8c49fad1fe9bccdcc7a988da922a4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.712417Z","signature_b64":"RlgpJBQVkUmd+WUBWABvMwrQ0NBPILxDVzRsJP8bvonHso+HuqACoEPAHV1QByW1ha9J2M929opTYg4sqjIgAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0b6f72476f852b593d0d01f3224090a07c6de8b5f499eff3e7599eeb364e486d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711246Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711246Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Assessing the dynamical assumptions in Tsirelson inequality tests of non-classicality in harmonic oscillators","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Quantum analysis shows uniform precession holds closely enough in harmonic oscillators that Tsirelson violations require quantum interference terms.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Arush Garg, Jonathan Halliwell, Taejas Venkataraman","submitted_at":"2025-09-03T09:33:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"\"Macrorealism\" posits that a system possesses definite properties at all times and that we can discover these properties, in principle, without disturbing the system's subsequent behaviour. The Leggett-Garg inequalities are derived under these assumptions and are readily violated by standard quantum mechanics, thereby providing a scheme to test whether demonstrably macroscopic systems can exhibit quantum coherence. Unfortunately, Leggett-Garg tests suffer from the difficult to avoid clumsiness loophole - the difficulty of proving that sequential measurements have not inadvertently disturbed th"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We show that various measures of uniform precession, some of which are related to Leggett-Garg quantities, are satisfied well enough that the presence of quantum-mechanical interference terms must be implied.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The chosen measures of generalized uniform precession (including those related to Leggett-Garg quantities) are sufficient to rule out classical explanations for Tsirelson inequality violations in the harmonic oscillator model.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Quantum-mechanical analysis of the Tsirelson inequality in harmonic oscillators shows that generalized uniform precession conditions hold sufficiently well to imply the presence of quantum interference terms.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Quantum analysis shows uniform precession holds closely enough in harmonic oscillators that Tsirelson violations require quantum interference terms.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"8251bbee0066e7db8aed1196a3c99c23099bb86673f0eef1d50f85c960812d3e"},"source":{"id":"2509.03166","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":"0bb606cf-861a-4512-910c-97b3fb8a58a6","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T19:49:18.103890Z","strongest_claim":"We show that various measures of uniform precession, some of which are related to Leggett-Garg quantities, are satisfied well enough that the presence of quantum-mechanical interference terms must be implied.","one_line_summary":"Quantum-mechanical analysis of the Tsirelson inequality in harmonic oscillators shows that generalized uniform precession conditions hold sufficiently well to imply the presence of quantum interference terms.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The chosen measures of generalized uniform precession (including those related to Leggett-Garg quantities) are sufficient to rule out classical explanations for Tsirelson inequality violations in the harmonic oscillator model.","pith_extraction_headline":"Quantum analysis shows uniform precession holds closely enough in harmonic oscillators that Tsirelson violations require quantum interference terms."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.03166/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":95,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Declare a data set, comprising measurements of⟨A⟩ (the Tsirelson test itself) as well as subsidiary quan- tities to gauge the dynamical assumption of uni- form precession (UP)","work_id":"81416278-2059-4571-861a-e4cdb6d568d7","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Write the Tsirelson quantity in the following form: 1 2(1 +⟨A⟩) = (Positive term) + (UP violating term) + (Quantum interference term),(3.1) where the scaled Tsirelson quantity 1 2(1 +⟨A⟩) is 8 bounded","work_id":"d2dc4f08-827e-4f78-9115-46df596d7e85","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"three-headed cat state","work_id":"56f37c42-6179-4435-accf-31137a981dbe","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"By this measure, a classical and quantum oscillator are indistinguishable","work_id":"d8a5c520-9e67-4306-bdf0-c1605dfa6ff6","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"This in turn is related to the fact that the Wigner function, for a class of potentials, has approximately classical evolution","work_id":"893e3527-36f5-44fa-a1e9-2b510f71b37c","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":95,"snapshot_sha256":"4b319746c11e369d47f75b519747b291a30932ff14ef261d14cd2fd14ab36912","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.03166","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.03166v4","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.03166","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BNXXER3PQUVV","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BNXXER3PQUVVSPIN","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BNXXER3P","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10315","citing_title":"Comparing quantum and classical finite state generators","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BNXXER3P"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BNXXER3P","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.03166&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BNXXER3PQUVVSPINAHZSEQEQUB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:36.711451+00:00"}