{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW","short_pith_number":"pith:CWUU657O","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"15a94f77ee9db984404401c672336835853f3c68d651b2dde7cc240af4de81c8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.19748","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"No-prior Bayes reIMagined: probabilistic approximations of inferential models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.PR","math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2025-03-25T15:11:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"When prior information is lacking, the go-to strategy for probabilistic inference is to combine a \"default prior\" and the likelihood via Bayes's theorem. Objective Bayes, (generalized) fiducial inference, etc. fall under this umbrella. This construction is natural, but the corresponding posterior distributions generally only offer limited, approximately valid uncertainty quantification. The present paper takes a reimagined approach that yields posterior distributions with stronger reliability properties. The proposed construction starts with an inferential model (IM), one that takes the mathem"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.19748","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-03-25T15:11:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.PR","math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"c7b3332159d0fd3ecbbc04100f7b1e4a04da0a7a316880ed673f181ce8a14e47","abstract_canon_sha256":"6e6df14568cb331d8d1ad2ae88cb32ef620537fb2b54e731320e7e55147f1176"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.792026Z","signature_b64":"HBMX2QHRNNc4pvWuIGQDh26xK2QNZ4WELcRaAln1wYIN7CfuQr9OjRe7M5PCyiVB5uKGwGUmASQ1jsRo0m0RDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"15a94f77ee9db984404401c672336835853f3c68d651b2dde7cc240af4de81c8","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791525Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791525Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"No-prior Bayes reIMagined: probabilistic approximations of inferential models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.PR","math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2025-03-25T15:11:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"When prior information is lacking, the go-to strategy for probabilistic inference is to combine a \"default prior\" and the likelihood via Bayes's theorem. Objective Bayes, (generalized) fiducial inference, etc. fall under this umbrella. This construction is natural, but the corresponding posterior distributions generally only offer limited, approximately valid uncertainty quantification. The present paper takes a reimagined approach that yields posterior distributions with stronger reliability properties. The proposed construction starts with an inferential model (IM), one that takes the mathem"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.19748","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.19748/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.19748","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.19748v4","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.19748","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CWUU657OTW4Y","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CWUU657OTW4YIQCE","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CWUU657O","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30229","citing_title":"Efficiency of Valid Inferential Models: Choquet-risk Optimal Possibility Measures, and Direct Comparisons","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09007","citing_title":"Possibilistic inferential models: a review","ref_index":103,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CWUU657O"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CWUU657O","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.19748&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CWUU657OTW4YIQCEAHDHEM3IGW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-23T03:13:44.791585+00:00"}