{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL","short_pith_number":"pith:CZU3WWQD","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T19:13:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"d99c160822215ff054d257bff0b69962c56c1a50d501a0b1882c9ceb3a537429","abstract_canon_sha256":"3328858edb644fd202d0e4e9c558faed7ced86840228988010bbb92a59ae8f1e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"1669bb5a03d2045aaf87c3eb1cdf955aeffaee269fd18d3572e1b0f37323661a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.15343","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15343","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15343v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15343","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CZU3WWQD2ICF","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4H","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CZU3WWQD","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T19:13:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"d99c160822215ff054d257bff0b69962c56c1a50d501a0b1882c9ceb3a537429","abstract_canon_sha256":"3328858edb644fd202d0e4e9c558faed7ced86840228988010bbb92a59ae8f1e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"1669bb5a03d2045aaf87c3eb1cdf955aeffaee269fd18d3572e1b0f37323661a","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53.518572Z","signature_b64":"LF54J20UrVMzsttIrmHX1+tz5buonE7i4m2m/n3PwJaQdmXGgudvB3vdtLsvPUJKpLySfqkAfHUwzwgVmAmxCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1669bb5a03d2045aaf87c3eb1cdf955aeffaee269fd18d3572e1b0f37323661a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53.517697Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53.517697Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.15343","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"2z2ytkh2SgLMnavKrnX/geSLV4cSIKJekvqWR4nU0iD566DKshKZnaws03U1lJbetg04jngM3lEfndOBm+JWDw==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-20T08:50:24.653546Z"},"content_sha256":"84a1af07a0352f8050132f24891930251c9bd56519cbeaccd7dff81c5088dfa9","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:84a1af07a0352f8050132f24891930251c9bd56519cbeaccd7dff81c5088dfa9"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Belief Engine: Configurable and Inspectable Stance Dynamics in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The Belief Engine makes stance changes in LLM deliberation auditable by extracting arguments and updating beliefs through a log-odds rule controlled by evidence uptake and prior anchoring.","cross_cats":["cs.LG","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Damian Dailisan, Joshua C. Yang, Maurice Flechtner, Michiel A. Bakker","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T19:13:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"LLM-based agents are increasingly used to simulate deliberative interactions such as negotiation, conflict resolution, and multi-turn opinion exchange. Yet generated transcripts often do not reveal why an agent's stance changes: movement may reflect evidence uptake, anchoring, role drift, echoing, or changed prompt and retrieval context. We introduce the Belief Engine (BE), an auditable belief-update layer that treats \"belief\" as an evidential state over a proposition and exposes it as scalar stance. BE extracts arguments into structured memory and updates stance with a log-odds rule controlle"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"BE best reconstructs participants whose final stance follows extracted evidence; stable and evidence-opposed cases instead point to anchoring or factors outside the extracted evidence stream.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the log-odds update rule controlled by evidence uptake u and prior anchoring a, together with the argument extraction step, sufficiently captures the actual mechanisms driving stance change in both LLM agents and human participants on the DEBATE dataset.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Belief Engine is a configurable belief-update mechanism for multi-agent LLM systems that uses structured argument extraction and log-odds stance updates to make evidence-grounded deliberation inspectable and controllable.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The Belief Engine makes stance changes in LLM deliberation auditable by extracting arguments and updating beliefs through a log-odds rule controlled by evidence uptake and prior anchoring.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"bb2878df1cd7064450a0bd31eadfbb0abe56e818ec0c5dc8eeac5ecb3fcfcef4"},"source":{"id":"2605.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"dd2c0541-f555-46ec-930f-23e2ff25f829","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T15:53:51.226444Z","strongest_claim":"BE best reconstructs participants whose final stance follows extracted evidence; stable and evidence-opposed cases instead point to anchoring or factors outside the extracted evidence stream.","one_line_summary":"Belief Engine is a configurable belief-update mechanism for multi-agent LLM systems that uses structured argument extraction and log-odds stance updates to make evidence-grounded deliberation inspectable and controllable.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the log-odds update rule controlled by evidence uptake u and prior anchoring a, together with the argument extraction step, sufficiently captures the actual mechanisms driving stance change in both LLM agents and human participants on the DEBATE dataset.","pith_extraction_headline":"The Belief Engine makes stance changes in LLM deliberation auditable by extracting arguments and updating beliefs through a log-odds rule controlled by evidence uptake and prior anchoring."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.15343/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:04:47.699579Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:01:18.116954Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T14:21:54.209184Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T13:33:22.754674Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"44968218a411621f21c5828dbeee6dbd1d28a68cd3f74beaa050946807da509c"},"references":{"count":77,"sample":[{"doi":"10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.486","year":2024,"title":"Knowledge Conflicts for LLM s: A Survey","work_id":"9c01124d-3717-4786-be2a-0a015e22089a","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19622 , year =","work_id":"d44ce627-3319-4eeb-9ccd-815b15cea9fb","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Bayesian teaching enables probabilistic reasoning in large language models","work_id":"fc63e46c-1d8b-4f4b-9977-114097d9cdd2","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.16","year":2024,"title":"Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates","work_id":"a02043a4-9f45-412d-a4d8-54af0933d2ce","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18489 , year =","work_id":"b26bd33d-758c-427c-970b-5969d3933530","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":77,"snapshot_sha256":"34183206a2866a492c6ed0a185a05b11d1cbb3f3cf96c0b029b2b2186c6a67f8","internal_anchors":4},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"dd2c0541-f555-46ec-930f-23e2ff25f829"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"kDjmF/RQnmaIZwzpjKn2eOsb6E481MDXhNHXM9RK/U2TBHmw3/+FEKoE/oK5N/nZ5de7UwlusnJeXNWpI0gACA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-20T08:50:24.654190Z"},"content_sha256":"22f6da9919423cc5454c3e96b6924b578cedce9e0a8e0f8e261206562bacb8e7","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:22f6da9919423cc5454c3e96b6924b578cedce9e0a8e0f8e261206562bacb8e7"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-20T08:50:24Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4HYPVRZX4VLL","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"3328858edb644fd202d0e4e9c558faed7ced86840228988010bbb92a59ae8f1e","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","cs.MA"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T19:13:12Z","title_canon_sha256":"d99c160822215ff054d257bff0b69962c56c1a50d501a0b1882c9ceb3a537429"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15343","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15343v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15343","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CZU3WWQD2ICF","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CZU3WWQD2ICFVL4H","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CZU3WWQD","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:22f6da9919423cc5454c3e96b6924b578cedce9e0a8e0f8e261206562bacb8e7","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"BE best reconstructs participants whose final stance follows extracted evidence; stable and evidence-opposed cases instead point to anchoring or factors outside the extracted evidence stream."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the log-odds update rule controlled by evidence uptake u and prior anchoring a, together with the argument extraction step, sufficiently captures the actual mechanisms driving stance change in both LLM agents and human participants on the DEBATE dataset."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Belief Engine is a configurable belief-update mechanism for multi-agent LLM systems that uses structured argument extraction and log-odds stance updates to make evidence-grounded deliberation inspectable and controllable."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The Belief Engine makes stance changes in LLM deliberation auditable by extracting arguments and updating beliefs through a log-odds rule controlled by evidence uptake and prior anchoring."}],"snapshot_sha256":"bb2878df1cd7064450a0bd31eadfbb0abe56e818ec0c5dc8eeac5ecb3fcfcef4"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:04:47.699579Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:01:18.116954Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T14:21:54.209184Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T13:33:22.754674Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0"}],"endpoint":"/pith/2605.15343/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"44968218a411621f21c5828dbeee6dbd1d28a68cd3f74beaa050946807da509c","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"LLM-based agents are increasingly used to simulate deliberative interactions such as negotiation, conflict resolution, and multi-turn opinion exchange. Yet generated transcripts often do not reveal why an agent's stance changes: movement may reflect evidence uptake, anchoring, role drift, echoing, or changed prompt and retrieval context. We introduce the Belief Engine (BE), an auditable belief-update layer that treats \"belief\" as an evidential state over a proposition and exposes it as scalar stance. BE extracts arguments into structured memory and updates stance with a log-odds rule controlle","authors_text":"Damian Dailisan, Joshua C. Yang, Maurice Flechtner, Michiel A. Bakker","cross_cats":["cs.LG","cs.MA"],"headline":"The Belief Engine makes stance changes in LLM deliberation auditable by extracting arguments and updating beliefs through a log-odds rule controlled by evidence uptake and prior anchoring.","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T19:13:12Z","title":"Belief Engine: Configurable and Inspectable Stance Dynamics in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation"},"references":{"count":77,"internal_anchors":4,"resolved_work":77,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.486","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Knowledge Conflicts for LLM s: A Survey","work_id":"9c01124d-3717-4786-be2a-0a015e22089a","year":2024},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19622 , year =","work_id":"d44ce627-3319-4eeb-9ccd-815b15cea9fb","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Bayesian teaching enables probabilistic reasoning in large language models","work_id":"fc63e46c-1d8b-4f4b-9977-114097d9cdd2","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.16","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates","work_id":"a02043a4-9f45-412d-a4d8-54af0933d2ce","year":2024},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18489 , year =","work_id":"b26bd33d-758c-427c-970b-5969d3933530","year":null}],"snapshot_sha256":"34183206a2866a492c6ed0a185a05b11d1cbb3f3cf96c0b029b2b2186c6a67f8"},"source":{"id":"2605.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-19T15:53:51.226444Z","id":"dd2c0541-f555-46ec-930f-23e2ff25f829","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Belief Engine is a configurable belief-update mechanism for multi-agent LLM systems that uses structured argument extraction and log-odds stance updates to make evidence-grounded deliberation inspectable and controllable.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"The Belief Engine makes stance changes in LLM deliberation auditable by extracting arguments and updating beliefs through a log-odds rule controlled by evidence uptake and prior anchoring.","strongest_claim":"BE best reconstructs participants whose final stance follows extracted evidence; stable and evidence-opposed cases instead point to anchoring or factors outside the extracted evidence stream.","weakest_assumption":"That the log-odds update rule controlled by evidence uptake u and prior anchoring a, together with the argument extraction step, sufficiently captures the actual mechanisms driving stance change in both LLM agents and human participants on the DEBATE dataset."}},"verdict_id":"dd2c0541-f555-46ec-930f-23e2ff25f829"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:84a1af07a0352f8050132f24891930251c9bd56519cbeaccd7dff81c5088dfa9","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"3328858edb644fd202d0e4e9c558faed7ced86840228988010bbb92a59ae8f1e","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","cs.MA"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T19:13:12Z","title_canon_sha256":"d99c160822215ff054d257bff0b69962c56c1a50d501a0b1882c9ceb3a537429"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"1669bb5a03d2045aaf87c3eb1cdf955aeffaee269fd18d3572e1b0f37323661a","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"1669bb5a03d2045aaf87c3eb1cdf955aeffaee269fd18d3572e1b0f37323661a","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53.517697Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53.517697Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"LF54J20UrVMzsttIrmHX1+tz5buonE7i4m2m/n3PwJaQdmXGgudvB3vdtLsvPUJKpLySfqkAfHUwzwgVmAmxCA==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:53.518572Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.15343","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:84a1af07a0352f8050132f24891930251c9bd56519cbeaccd7dff81c5088dfa9","sha256:22f6da9919423cc5454c3e96b6924b578cedce9e0a8e0f8e261206562bacb8e7"],"state_sha256":"b1d3c9a8d5f067a043ae977492bbbc2b25b97493073ccd626e22b9eca6fd21c1"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"eq6VfA9kDl6rWalHxy1IpTlmMqMjC9B/dkFwZ/zohUNo6TIa9VS4Embze6Dodw8sbe6T1c+Fy0P4MRmazrp3Ag==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-20T08:50:24.656886Z","bundle_sha256":"44f8a52783185a5d6bde0204f985fba63ecc360eb458ac1103720e7985f87628"}}