{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU","short_pith_number":"pith:D6IHAOKB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1f90703941b77b6dea378e09bf30b7752b1d7c0fc03788713fadea6aa8332dda","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.09063","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"First-class constraints generate gauge transformations in electromagnetism (reply to Pitts)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"David Wallace, Oliver Pooley","submitted_at":"2022-10-17T13:02:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Brian Pitts has recently claimed to show via straightforward calculation that, at least in the case of Hamiltonian electromagnetism, an arbitrary first-class constraint ``generates not a gauge transformation, but a bad physical change'' (Annals of Physics 351 (2014) pp.382-406; arXiv:1310.2756). We show, via a straightforward calculation, that a transformation generated by an arbitrary first-class constraint relates gauge-equivalent phase space points, vindicating orthodoxy. Pitts, however, is primarily concerned with transformations of entire histories, rather than of instantaneous states. We"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.09063","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2022-10-17T13:02:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3a431ee400250daf0534c47a27e3a96ca143c1158f713bed883f5df30595aef8","abstract_canon_sha256":"c1c41578d0b240b20f62101a743b29acabd7a6cca1fa421bdd83abd8d09091a7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.612163Z","signature_b64":"1ADa0rl0Atatc9B3n6S8aGMFSo56lCidx7jcQA8yZmDyJzBkyoAXk4kPdKos96Wmf166lPYpDPWDbLmW1fC1AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1f90703941b77b6dea378e09bf30b7752b1d7c0fc03788713fadea6aa8332dda","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611709Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611709Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"First-class constraints generate gauge transformations in electromagnetism (reply to Pitts)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"David Wallace, Oliver Pooley","submitted_at":"2022-10-17T13:02:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Brian Pitts has recently claimed to show via straightforward calculation that, at least in the case of Hamiltonian electromagnetism, an arbitrary first-class constraint ``generates not a gauge transformation, but a bad physical change'' (Annals of Physics 351 (2014) pp.382-406; arXiv:1310.2756). We show, via a straightforward calculation, that a transformation generated by an arbitrary first-class constraint relates gauge-equivalent phase space points, vindicating orthodoxy. Pitts, however, is primarily concerned with transformations of entire histories, rather than of instantaneous states. We"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.09063","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.09063/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.09063","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.09063v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.09063","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"D6IHAOKBW55W","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"D6IHAOKBW55W32RX","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"D6IHAOKB","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.16151","citing_title":"Global Gauge Symmetries and Spatial Asymptotic Boundary Conditions in Yang-Mills Theory","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22260","citing_title":"The Limitations of the Notion of `Observable' in Diffeomorphism-Invariant Models","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D6IHAOKB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D6IHAOKB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.09063&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/D6IHAOKBW55W32RXRYE36MFXOU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:18.611766+00:00"}