{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H","short_pith_number":"pith:DRSEEFRM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1c6442162cf7b809a47a7ae0292a81f1f0a1b53112a93ae919ee94c0f1f965a0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1605.05447","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is the GW150914-GBM really associated with the GW150914?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Shaolin Xiong","submitted_at":"2016-05-18T05:52:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Finding the electromagnetic (EM) counterpart is critically important for a gravitational wave event. Although many efforts have been made to search for the purported EM counterpart of GW150914, the first gravitational wave event detected by LIGO, only Fermi/GBM reported an excess above background (i.e. GW150914-GBM) at 0.4 s after the LIGO trigger time, that is possibly associated with this GW event (Connaughton et al. 2016). However, since there is no significant detection by the INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS around the time of GW150914-GBM, a great debate has been raised about whether GW150914-GBM is of "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1605.05447","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2016-05-18T05:52:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"978db8f5e682ed9002ff3e3ef5997b35d39b211c593988bacf48d73d261516ef","abstract_canon_sha256":"20e3f2248d7d0c6668d9b810876214a8d788bb81e43af8c692bd8841ae20195c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.925137Z","signature_b64":"6W1aTN2EUaAC1hXJ46xOf042bBUyy5UbpLpY7oLp4ddP7j8RN6VU5r9/2f9LldKgYsc48BsrHTcnTW/x4Pj1Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1c6442162cf7b809a47a7ae0292a81f1f0a1b53112a93ae919ee94c0f1f965a0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924393Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924393Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is the GW150914-GBM really associated with the GW150914?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Shaolin Xiong","submitted_at":"2016-05-18T05:52:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Finding the electromagnetic (EM) counterpart is critically important for a gravitational wave event. Although many efforts have been made to search for the purported EM counterpart of GW150914, the first gravitational wave event detected by LIGO, only Fermi/GBM reported an excess above background (i.e. GW150914-GBM) at 0.4 s after the LIGO trigger time, that is possibly associated with this GW event (Connaughton et al. 2016). However, since there is no significant detection by the INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS around the time of GW150914-GBM, a great debate has been raised about whether GW150914-GBM is of "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1605.05447","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1605.05447","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1605.05447v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1605.05447","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DRSEEFRM664A","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DRSEEFRM664ATJD2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DRSEEFRM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.02995","citing_title":"Extending the short gamma-ray burst population from sub-threshold triggers in Fermi/GBM and GECAM data and its implications","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DRSEEFRM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DRSEEFRM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1605.05447&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DRSEEFRM664ATJD2PLQCSKUB6H/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924506+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:34.924506+00:00"}