{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33","short_pith_number":"pith:DU6WJ33I","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1d3d64ef68836caea6d9c6b11d8aeedef9ee48bb219f7e4144bc0483e058225b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.02249","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Study of Belief Revision Postulates in Multi-Agent Systems (Extended Version)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Michael Thielscher, Tran Cao Son","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T05:46:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We investigate the belief revision problem in epistemic planning, i.e., what will be the beliefs of all agents in a multi-agent system after an agent gains the belief in some state property. Based on the standard representation in epistemic planning of agents' beliefs via a single multi-agent Kripke model, we generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed. As an example of a simple operator"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.02249","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T05:46:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"84baad6e5c14bb325a8e13679e61ae6455490890752adada6d7e0c11165a3ef4","abstract_canon_sha256":"2c73510e0d85f2ec6baa833bb9fd1b68295454d6b7790c5ce51bffa65ec96e58"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.517277Z","signature_b64":"jAeSktyONNHnujH+xnAnQaUOKmtsNcVCpBV6O9k3L4l5H1fLD/yiQO2vKe7F9aobyjPN9UcvPUIZ3GNHsEPrBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1d3d64ef68836caea6d9c6b11d8aeedef9ee48bb219f7e4144bc0483e058225b","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516344Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516344Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Study of Belief Revision Postulates in Multi-Agent Systems (Extended Version)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Michael Thielscher, Tran Cao Son","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T05:46:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We investigate the belief revision problem in epistemic planning, i.e., what will be the beliefs of all agents in a multi-agent system after an agent gains the belief in some state property. Based on the standard representation in epistemic planning of agents' beliefs via a single multi-agent Kripke model, we generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed. As an example of a simple operator"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That agents' beliefs in epistemic planning are adequately captured by a single multi-agent Kripke model, allowing the AGM postulates to be lifted without loss of essential properties.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Generalizes AGM belief revision postulates to multi-agent systems via Kripke models, provides satisfying operators like generalized full-meet revision, and discusses challenges for iterated revision.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"fbcb43a26d52e47c8c4c666ce89bcc428ce595c0868f075168f7addbc4042bed"},"source":{"id":"2605.02249","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"77e8dcfb-16c7-42bf-b04b-1ce546502080","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-09T16:25:40.454964Z","strongest_claim":"We generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed.","one_line_summary":"Generalizes AGM belief revision postulates to multi-agent systems via Kripke models, provides satisfying operators like generalized full-meet revision, and discusses challenges for iterated revision.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That agents' beliefs in epistemic planning are adequately captured by a single multi-agent Kripke model, allowing the AGM postulates to be lifted without loss of essential properties.","pith_extraction_headline":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.02249/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-20T16:35:28.031092Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-20T03:31:23.067605Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:31:32.052379Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"9fb40f9ed73bb5eed042ab81e3aaa363189589f3bff02a3db4de7c4a909db776"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.02249","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.02249v2","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.02249","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DU6WJ33IQNWK","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZ","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DU6WJ33I","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DU6WJ33I"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DU6WJ33I","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.02249&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DU6WJ33IQNWK5JWZY2YR3CXO33/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:25.516479+00:00"}