{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL","short_pith_number":"pith:DWQX5SIE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1da17ec9044e784754a6a2034791a47adb4be04e5349f448fc4e003dd76a03cc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1501.05145","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Symmetry warrants rational cooperation by co-action in Social Dilemmas","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT","nlin.AO"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Sitabhra Sinha, V. Sasidevan","submitted_at":"2015-01-21T11:52:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Is it rational for selfish individuals to cooperate? The conventional answer based on analysis of games such as the Prisoners Dilemma (PD) is that it is not, even though mutual cooperation results in a better outcome for all. This incompatibility between individual rationality and collective benefit lies at the heart of questions about the evolution of cooperation, as illustrated by PD and similar games. Here, we argue that this apparent incompatibility is due to an inconsistency in the standard Nash framework for analyzing non-cooperative games and propose a new paradigm, that of the co-actio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1501.05145","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2015-01-21T11:52:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT","nlin.AO"],"title_canon_sha256":"5ae8c937070f199b20f1fff9816a0039c3ef4579a04ef2242ae6318a69aa4ae9","abstract_canon_sha256":"5c5ac010c4be71c73b2f16c6ef3e85c307399300926d0341ddd6e33789b1efba"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.480592Z","signature_b64":"q1v7i6ruZnG7/QLTImuADHPJexCOAQJ8PggnMrDXULOVTmGW96sDVble5idx+7TpVMCX6gOfi6uEyCiDT1fABw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1da17ec9044e784754a6a2034791a47adb4be04e5349f448fc4e003dd76a03cc","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479873Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479873Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Symmetry warrants rational cooperation by co-action in Social Dilemmas","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT","nlin.AO"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Sitabhra Sinha, V. Sasidevan","submitted_at":"2015-01-21T11:52:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Is it rational for selfish individuals to cooperate? The conventional answer based on analysis of games such as the Prisoners Dilemma (PD) is that it is not, even though mutual cooperation results in a better outcome for all. This incompatibility between individual rationality and collective benefit lies at the heart of questions about the evolution of cooperation, as illustrated by PD and similar games. Here, we argue that this apparent incompatibility is due to an inconsistency in the standard Nash framework for analyzing non-cooperative games and propose a new paradigm, that of the co-actio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1501.05145","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1501.05145","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1501.05145v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1501.05145","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DWQX5SIEJZ4E","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:17.054201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:17.054201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DWQX5SIE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:17.054201+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DWQX5SIE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DWQX5SIE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1501.05145&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DWQX5SIEJZ4EOVFGUIBUPENEPL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479991+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:35:22.479991+00:00"}