{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP","short_pith_number":"pith:EJWVHTWF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"226d53cec53e5f094148f72f28df529bd29f80623f2a12a79abb014b0c46f4a1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2511.10499","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bayesian model comparison and validation with Gaussian Process Regression for interferometric 21-cm signal recovery","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Eloy de Lera Acedo, Peter Sims, Yuchen Liu","submitted_at":"2025-11-13T17:05:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"The 21-cm signal from neutral hydrogen is anticipated to reveal critical insights into the formation of early cosmic structures during the Cosmic Dawn and the subsequent Epoch of Reionization. However, the intrinsic faintness of the signal, as opposed to astrophysical foregrounds, poses a formidable challenge for its detection. Motivated by the recent success of machine learning based Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) methods in LOFAR and NenuFAR observations, we perform a Bayesian comparison among five GPR models to account for the simulated 4-hour tracking observations with the SKA-Low teles"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2511.10499","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2025-11-13T17:05:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.IM"],"title_canon_sha256":"217dac4b3b19c43bfc5f3f42ff3fe42c81fda4ab0518117324640d6ecf6e8c2d","abstract_canon_sha256":"3fefb804abcb19f22eba5563a5bc827f6e71154e5f8563c6ec1417c5662110f9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723912Z","signature_b64":"52fT2GuAJg5YPVw6FGJ4d3ZiYjCLW4ty9kEbEeryUvXgBcD68r3bDOxrwJCAyb+LHUJlFS5wiYS06pGwzijlBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"226d53cec53e5f094148f72f28df529bd29f80623f2a12a79abb014b0c46f4a1","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723082Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723082Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bayesian model comparison and validation with Gaussian Process Regression for interferometric 21-cm signal recovery","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Eloy de Lera Acedo, Peter Sims, Yuchen Liu","submitted_at":"2025-11-13T17:05:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"The 21-cm signal from neutral hydrogen is anticipated to reveal critical insights into the formation of early cosmic structures during the Cosmic Dawn and the subsequent Epoch of Reionization. However, the intrinsic faintness of the signal, as opposed to astrophysical foregrounds, poses a formidable challenge for its detection. Motivated by the recent success of machine learning based Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) methods in LOFAR and NenuFAR observations, we perform a Bayesian comparison among five GPR models to account for the simulated 4-hour tracking observations with the SKA-Low teles"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2511.10499","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2511.10499/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2511.10499","created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2511.10499v1","created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2511.10499","created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EJWVHTWFHZPQ","created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI","created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EJWVHTWF","created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10928","citing_title":"Mitigating residual foregrounds and systematic errors in SKA1-Low AA* EoR observations via Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EJWVHTWF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EJWVHTWF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2511.10499&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EJWVHTWFHZPQSQKI64XSRX2STP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-27T14:06:38.723222+00:00"}