{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3","short_pith_number":"pith:FSB3BZLN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2c83b0e56d6ccb64b44d78512dc8bd0ec51d9619e15bac536ebb44d99d499d70","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.02731","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Systematic Review: Anomaly Detection in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"E. Mariconti, J. R. V. Solaas, N. Tuptuk","submitted_at":"2024-05-04T18:31:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"This systematic review focuses on anomaly detection for connected and autonomous vehicles. The initial database search identified 2160 articles, of which 203 were included in this review after rigorous screening and assessment. This study revealed that the most commonly used Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms employed in anomaly detection are neural networks like LSTM, CNN, and autoencoders, alongside one-class SVM. Most anomaly-based models were trained using real-world operational vehicle data, although anomalies, such as attacks and faults, were often injected artificially into the dat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.02731","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-05-04T18:31:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"66bf42003260b04a4e06230341a0a9aeba24720ef240f61d6edf470efc93c1f1","abstract_canon_sha256":"e36c226bd6a3c45a706932b99203549024c376ef820bb13192ae2390976190f8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.121170Z","signature_b64":"2L3BohANx+OUc4kX90vqdFfpoKt+k7hwISe78BKcSPiMDg2QQOrrV3l4iG3PnFVphXtSlgwW+2ucOoRfssotAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2c83b0e56d6ccb64b44d78512dc8bd0ec51d9619e15bac536ebb44d99d499d70","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120662Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120662Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Systematic Review: Anomaly Detection in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"E. Mariconti, J. R. V. Solaas, N. Tuptuk","submitted_at":"2024-05-04T18:31:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"This systematic review focuses on anomaly detection for connected and autonomous vehicles. The initial database search identified 2160 articles, of which 203 were included in this review after rigorous screening and assessment. This study revealed that the most commonly used Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms employed in anomaly detection are neural networks like LSTM, CNN, and autoencoders, alongside one-class SVM. Most anomaly-based models were trained using real-world operational vehicle data, although anomalies, such as attacks and faults, were often injected artificially into the dat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.02731","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.02731/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.02731","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.02731v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.02731","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FSB3BZLNNTFW","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FSB3BZLN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.13461","citing_title":"Look Inside for More: Internal Spatial Modality Perception for 3D Anomaly Detection","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FSB3BZLN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FSB3BZLN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.02731&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FSB3BZLNNTFWJNCNPBIS3SF5B3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:53.120725+00:00"}