{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG","short_pith_number":"pith:G767KIA6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"37fdf5201ed2c77c66dd31c9c2fdba119606ab1f2a813efdb9a4eed1dd20c9eb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.10554","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Benchmarking Knowledge Editing using Logical Rules","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Hamada M. Zahera, NDah Jean Kouagou, Tatiana Moteu Ngoli","submitted_at":"2026-06-09T08:21:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications that require access to up-to-date knowledge. However, retraining LLMs is computationally expensive. Therefore, knowledge editing techniques are crucial for maintaining current information and correcting erroneous assertions within pre-trained models. Current benchmarks for knowledge editing primarily focus on recalling edited facts, often neglecting their logical consequences. To address this limitation, we introduce a new benchmark designed to evaluate how knowledge editing methods handle the logical consequence"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.10554","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-06-09T08:21:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"13be545c8dcbd77583c3fc2a6e73cceda9eff8ef1a6c35a7dbb6af7df81b4bb2","abstract_canon_sha256":"7fa8f2fe64d4cabf1e32a0d94d7ee4258654aa9147a5505737563224df91373c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844795Z","signature_b64":"cIY6MJvRTxAUbKSwRhK5vV3caey5dP1JYr4/bU5qtsK1oPtN70jsxuWR0ity3slWiaSeWXBfOMeeACRyXuTDDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"37fdf5201ed2c77c66dd31c9c2fdba119606ab1f2a813efdb9a4eed1dd20c9eb","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.843980Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.843980Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Benchmarking Knowledge Editing using Logical Rules","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Hamada M. Zahera, NDah Jean Kouagou, Tatiana Moteu Ngoli","submitted_at":"2026-06-09T08:21:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications that require access to up-to-date knowledge. However, retraining LLMs is computationally expensive. Therefore, knowledge editing techniques are crucial for maintaining current information and correcting erroneous assertions within pre-trained models. Current benchmarks for knowledge editing primarily focus on recalling edited facts, often neglecting their logical consequences. To address this limitation, we introduce a new benchmark designed to evaluate how knowledge editing methods handle the logical consequence"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.10554","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.10554/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.10554","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.10554v1","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.10554","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"G767KIA62LDX","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"G767KIA62LDXYZW5","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"G767KIA6","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/G767KIA6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/G767KIA6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.10554&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/G767KIA62LDXYZW5GHE4F7N2CG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-10T01:10:25.844113+00:00"}