{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX","short_pith_number":"pith:GOSM2XGI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"33a4cd5cc849d8b019c1d1b2dffdca55d6170dd912d3ab65e0736fdc12ef277f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.19291","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Dynamic Human Trust Modeling of Autonomous Agents With Varying Capability and Strategy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Davis), Jason Dekarske (1), Sanjay Joshi (1) ((1) University of California, Zhaodan Kong (1)","submitted_at":"2024-04-30T06:47:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Objective We model the dynamic trust of human subjects in a human-autonomy-teaming screen-based task.\n  Background Trust is an emerging area of study in human-robot collaboration. Many studies have looked at the issue of robot performance as a sole predictor of human trust, but this could underestimate the complexity of the interaction.\n  Method Subjects were paired with autonomous agents to search an on-screen grid to determine the number of outlier objects. In each trial, a different autonomous agent with a preassigned capability used one of three search strategies and then reported the numb"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.19291","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-04-30T06:47:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1693e9d772076359eed3992531b9b888d6bab439497d9d269fe0bb8fb079d7f1","abstract_canon_sha256":"ba9d9a9831b6273765435fea7a38b69f464b305bfdbbe2f3c7453a518facc0bf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.881260Z","signature_b64":"3tleErq6MHHlb9MkvFN7EuqzvlIRmehm5izWUIdV+PVEs6UYBa7SDdr4BUL/7rirwasEfMFYtdpRqTK96T4lAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"33a4cd5cc849d8b019c1d1b2dffdca55d6170dd912d3ab65e0736fdc12ef277f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880830Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880830Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Dynamic Human Trust Modeling of Autonomous Agents With Varying Capability and Strategy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Davis), Jason Dekarske (1), Sanjay Joshi (1) ((1) University of California, Zhaodan Kong (1)","submitted_at":"2024-04-30T06:47:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Objective We model the dynamic trust of human subjects in a human-autonomy-teaming screen-based task.\n  Background Trust is an emerging area of study in human-robot collaboration. Many studies have looked at the issue of robot performance as a sole predictor of human trust, but this could underestimate the complexity of the interaction.\n  Method Subjects were paired with autonomous agents to search an on-screen grid to determine the number of outlier objects. In each trial, a different autonomous agent with a preassigned capability used one of three search strategies and then reported the numb"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.19291","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.19291/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.19291","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.19291v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.19291","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GOSM2XGIJHML","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GOSM2XGI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.01346","citing_title":"Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GOSM2XGI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GOSM2XGI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.19291&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GOSM2XGIJHMLAGOB2GZN77OKKX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:40.880885+00:00"}