{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD","short_pith_number":"pith:GTIWSWYP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"34d1695b0f319a2dbc7867c1cdfd0c48ddeab0b07f11e8846c894c281724f47c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.19874","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum Key Distribution with Basis-Dependent Detection Probability","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Adam Widomski, Chiara Macchiavello, Dagmar Bru{\\ss}, Federico Grasselli, Giovanni Chesi, Hermann Kampermann, Maciej Ogrodnik, Micha{\\l} Karpi\\'nski, Nathan Walk, Nikolai Wyderka","submitted_at":"2024-11-29T17:35:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a promising technology for secure communication. Nevertheless, QKD is still treated with caution in certain contexts due to potential gaps between theoretical models and actual QKD implementations. A common assumption in security proofs is that the detection probability at the receiver, for a given input state, is independent of the measurement basis, which might not always be verified and could lead to security loopholes. This paper presents a security proof for QKD protocols that does not rely on the above assumption and is thus applicable in scenarios with "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.19874","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2024-11-29T17:35:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1f1ce43e8a0fb86087235055e94ff470518899aa5ff7b4aa54fcb872b334143f","abstract_canon_sha256":"7f427710b32cdf71da6ff147c62c1680a3b650597689b79119d85c04cb0a23f6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270772Z","signature_b64":"3nMcMjt/TNJJutoOW4obGKDXBQH9sCOD3R7nRWHQXBv+Dz9y0BiWrMghIwWDh8ukqEeccP0gfUXeOj2oDQVdDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"34d1695b0f319a2dbc7867c1cdfd0c48ddeab0b07f11e8846c894c281724f47c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270155Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270155Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum Key Distribution with Basis-Dependent Detection Probability","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Adam Widomski, Chiara Macchiavello, Dagmar Bru{\\ss}, Federico Grasselli, Giovanni Chesi, Hermann Kampermann, Maciej Ogrodnik, Micha{\\l} Karpi\\'nski, Nathan Walk, Nikolai Wyderka","submitted_at":"2024-11-29T17:35:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a promising technology for secure communication. Nevertheless, QKD is still treated with caution in certain contexts due to potential gaps between theoretical models and actual QKD implementations. A common assumption in security proofs is that the detection probability at the receiver, for a given input state, is independent of the measurement basis, which might not always be verified and could lead to security loopholes. This paper presents a security proof for QKD protocols that does not rely on the above assumption and is thus applicable in scenarios with "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.19874","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.19874/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.19874","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.19874v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.19874","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GTIWSWYPGGNC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GTIWSWYP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.03549","citing_title":"Security of quantum key distribution with source and detector imperfections through phase-error estimation","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GTIWSWYP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GTIWSWYP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.19874&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GTIWSWYPGGNC3PDYM7A437IMJD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.270228+00:00"}