{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2","short_pith_number":"pith:HGO4YHTQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"399dcc1e7039f08d250f439d25dd610682952d3358fb47968df8d6d8516b618b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2510.13961","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Tests of restricted Quantum Focusing and a new CFT bound","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Arvin Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Fran\\c{c}ois Rondeau, Patrick Tran, Sami Kaya, Victor Franken","submitted_at":"2025-10-15T18:00:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"The restricted quantum focusing conjecture (rQFC) plays a central role in an axiomatic formulation of semiclassical gravity. Since much hinges on its validity, it is imperative to subject the rQFC to rigorous tests in novel settings. Here we do so in two independent directions. First, we prove rQFC in a class of spacetime dimension $d=2$ toy models, JT gravity coupled to a QFT. We also construct explicit counter-examples to the original and stronger Quantum Focusing Conjecture in a regime where matter quantum effects are comparable to the total dilaton value. Second, for $d>2$, we derive from "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2510.13961","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2025-10-15T18:00:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"2b30db8230d4d963d8b8124d676fcec8b4a1590511c68401a2af987f2f727f5a","abstract_canon_sha256":"f7524d322395d11c0ea03cf9967ac542101d2a2b09c87bf512a24b0709831af5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.305539Z","signature_b64":"PZkNK0WDP2Sp/nYY8r9T1VUW6OjoOXqI0zUIE0TqYCW35HHWE//x4o2J46U5i2MeweQgVHacEV21sWPVp/LsDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"399dcc1e7039f08d250f439d25dd610682952d3358fb47968df8d6d8516b618b","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304839Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304839Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Tests of restricted Quantum Focusing and a new CFT bound","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Arvin Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Fran\\c{c}ois Rondeau, Patrick Tran, Sami Kaya, Victor Franken","submitted_at":"2025-10-15T18:00:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"The restricted quantum focusing conjecture (rQFC) plays a central role in an axiomatic formulation of semiclassical gravity. Since much hinges on its validity, it is imperative to subject the rQFC to rigorous tests in novel settings. Here we do so in two independent directions. First, we prove rQFC in a class of spacetime dimension $d=2$ toy models, JT gravity coupled to a QFT. We also construct explicit counter-examples to the original and stronger Quantum Focusing Conjecture in a regime where matter quantum effects are comparable to the total dilaton value. Second, for $d>2$, we derive from "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2510.13961","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2510.13961/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2510.13961","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2510.13961v3","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2510.13961","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HGO4YHTQHHYI","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIP","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HGO4YHTQ","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.13957","citing_title":"A Quantum Weak Cosmic Censorship and Its Proof","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20165","citing_title":"Entropy bound and the non-universality of entanglement islands","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HGO4YHTQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HGO4YHTQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2510.13961&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HGO4YHTQHHYI2JIPIOOSLXLBA2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:10.304933+00:00"}