{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X","short_pith_number":"pith:I7DZBICT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"47c790a0531226e7f6b3c6aa26264cddc6aa9ccb020a0fe340727b12d8dadd61","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.23276","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Bernhard Sch\\\"olkopf, David Guzman Piedrahita, Giorgia Ramponi, Mrinmaya Sachan, Yongjin Yang, Zhijing Jin","submitted_at":"2025-06-29T15:02:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, understanding their cooperation and social mechanisms is becoming increasingly important. In particular, how LLMs balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment. In this paper, we examine the challenge of costly sanctioning in multi-agent LLM systems, where an agent must decide whether to invest its own resources to incentivize cooperation or penalize defection. To study this, we adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.23276","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-06-29T15:02:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"dbb719acc312bb571582d149b21e8b7ce2e3260859a34095d6ab334aa00a183c","abstract_canon_sha256":"ed482017c6f15bdc727ac050412596915cda0c4896a65cc631b6e676bc60947b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.270233Z","signature_b64":"PxgPBOlJ1hUG2IvTVFk3P5f8FRg+MsIma9Z6mrdktQXJl1f1nwkSW3/l6+QhRbtXWrimOdTabckiqZan77mkAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"47c790a0531226e7f6b3c6aa26264cddc6aa9ccb020a0fe340727b12d8dadd61","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269657Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269657Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Bernhard Sch\\\"olkopf, David Guzman Piedrahita, Giorgia Ramponi, Mrinmaya Sachan, Yongjin Yang, Zhijing Jin","submitted_at":"2025-06-29T15:02:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, understanding their cooperation and social mechanisms is becoming increasingly important. In particular, how LLMs balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment. In this paper, we examine the challenge of costly sanctioning in multi-agent LLM systems, where an agent must decide whether to invest its own resources to incentivize cooperation or penalize defection. To study this, we adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.23276","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.23276/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.23276","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.23276v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.23276","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"I7DZBICTCITO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"I7DZBICTCITOP5VT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"I7DZBICT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30571","citing_title":"Attractor States Emerge in Multi-Turn LLM Conversations","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19351","citing_title":"PAVE: A Cognitive Architecture for Legitimate Violation in Generative Agent Societies","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20658","citing_title":"Cooperative Profiles Predict Multi-Agent LLM Team Performance in AI for Science Workflows","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08060","citing_title":"The Memory Curse: How Expanded Recall Erodes Cooperative Intent in LLM Agents","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X","json":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I7DZBICT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I7DZBICT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.23276&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/I7DZBICTCITOP5VTY2VCMJSM3X/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:31.269728+00:00"}