{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH","short_pith_number":"pith:IE7YCZN7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"413f8165bf434058d70ff64810bbfe11ff0d0cce80faa5de68e64c4c59705b7f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2010.09926","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Francesca Toni, Neema Kotonya","submitted_at":"2020-10-19T23:51:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fact-checking is the task of verifying the veracity of claims by assessing their assertions against credible evidence. The vast majority of fact-checking studies focus exclusively on political claims. Very little research explores fact-checking for other topics, specifically subject matters for which expertise is required. We present the first study of explainable fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise. For our case study we choose the setting of public health. To support this case study we construct a new dataset PUBHEALTH of 11.8K claims accompanied by journalist crafted, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2010.09926","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-10-19T23:51:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"189dfc74b4c921f9eab1aedd39f2ae4c23cbb19782b1662fc2fdf9ff96805f69","abstract_canon_sha256":"572520916f99793e92a18e8365c99bc0f4c323835caddd15c7a5b323281a5770"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.293230Z","signature_b64":"kZ7oLGLRB89+98ljjMxW2g8FOWuR8bvizqMBDUB5Ht3/ElITVdroyHnpNnc2kYyDaBzDyuObrzaHUzOgkDJ/Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"413f8165bf434058d70ff64810bbfe11ff0d0cce80faa5de68e64c4c59705b7f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292745Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292745Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Francesca Toni, Neema Kotonya","submitted_at":"2020-10-19T23:51:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fact-checking is the task of verifying the veracity of claims by assessing their assertions against credible evidence. The vast majority of fact-checking studies focus exclusively on political claims. Very little research explores fact-checking for other topics, specifically subject matters for which expertise is required. We present the first study of explainable fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise. For our case study we choose the setting of public health. To support this case study we construct a new dataset PUBHEALTH of 11.8K claims accompanied by journalist crafted, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2010.09926","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2010.09926/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2010.09926","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2010.09926v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2010.09926","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IE7YCZN7INAF","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IE7YCZN7","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12854","citing_title":"Small LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification: Cost-Effective Fine-Tuning, Structural Dataset Shortcuts, and Cross-Domain Generalization","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2312.10997","citing_title":"Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey","ref_index":150,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20233","citing_title":"REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IE7YCZN7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IE7YCZN7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2010.09926&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IE7YCZN7INAFRVYP6ZEBBO76CH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:25.292802+00:00"}