{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW","short_pith_number":"pith:IHTAA3TU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"41e6006e742015fbb587562020814e35b64c78d9dae227392e10509ce3463e97","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1812.06451","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Non Locality versus Modified Realism: Convivial Solipsism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Herv\\'e Zwirn","submitted_at":"2018-12-16T12:00:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"A large number of physicists now admit that quantum mechanics is a non local theory. The EPR argument and the many experiments (including recent loop-hole free tests) showing the violation of Bell's inequalities seem to have confirmed convincingly that quantum mechanics cannot be local. Nevertheless, this conclusion can only be drawn inside a standard realist framework assuming an ontic interpretation of the wave function and viewing the collapse of the wave function as a real change in the physical state of the system. We show that this standpoint is not mandatory and that if the collapse is "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1812.06451","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2018-12-16T12:00:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"36c88da0fb1620a435befab368f35135e2a0d2a99bb6c4cbfc94871b5baa9060","abstract_canon_sha256":"375daca35a27dd3e40c97bee429ec9b1571a4a48325d15ea84423f07fe510d91"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.359399Z","signature_b64":"cI0CO/IN7UToFGPlvshTe3c/2ue+iAlOCSUxaCnMBO6Ks9v+ZYffxNno2F8xuX2mufmofTCKGKtV3esdNNvXCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"41e6006e742015fbb587562020814e35b64c78d9dae227392e10509ce3463e97","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358901Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358901Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Non Locality versus Modified Realism: Convivial Solipsism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Herv\\'e Zwirn","submitted_at":"2018-12-16T12:00:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"A large number of physicists now admit that quantum mechanics is a non local theory. The EPR argument and the many experiments (including recent loop-hole free tests) showing the violation of Bell's inequalities seem to have confirmed convincingly that quantum mechanics cannot be local. Nevertheless, this conclusion can only be drawn inside a standard realist framework assuming an ontic interpretation of the wave function and viewing the collapse of the wave function as a real change in the physical state of the system. We show that this standpoint is not mandatory and that if the collapse is "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1812.06451","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1812.06451/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1812.06451","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1812.06451v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1812.06451","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IHTAA3TUEAK7","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMH","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IHTAA3TU","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01349","citing_title":"Is Quantum Mechanics Universal? EWF Experiments and Non Absoluteness of Events","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IHTAA3TU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IHTAA3TU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1812.06451&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IHTAA3TUEAK7XNMHKYQCBAKOGW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:18:32.358959+00:00"}