{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O","short_pith_number":"pith:JG5JNIJS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"49ba96a13210d75ca3a8c7b175c987db8071f1d7c299105ab3b0972eb8eeb60f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.03361","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"nicolay-r at SemEval-2024 Task 3: Using Flan-T5 for Reasoning Emotion Cause in Conversations with Chain-of-Thought on Emotion States","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Huizhi Liang, Nicolay Rusnachenko","submitted_at":"2024-04-04T11:03:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Emotion expression is one of the essential traits of conversations. It may be self-related or caused by another speaker. The variety of reasons may serve as a source of the further emotion causes: conversation history, speaker's emotional state, etc. Inspired by the most recent advances in Chain-of-Thought, in this work, we exploit the existing three-hop reasoning approach (THOR) to perform large language model instruction-tuning for answering: emotion states (THOR-state), and emotion caused by one speaker to the other (THOR-cause). We equip THOR-cause with the reasoning revision (rr) for devi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.03361","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-04-04T11:03:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f402e59b1691c1f90b81f9a3dc55f0b2f1c3d94bc115ad49e926e20613d8c2d1","abstract_canon_sha256":"4ff1213e5bb85814c724589a5f5df898ff1dec0ff0079e9baf516a4ceca6d16f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645805Z","signature_b64":"sUr6+x9WmwmYzvJdRg/UpbHiZ1ikmM/j+NIVlylQvV43k0WgghuAOaVcF7HN4r58QHQm40fXZLIKPuLqqYPPCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"49ba96a13210d75ca3a8c7b175c987db8071f1d7c299105ab3b0972eb8eeb60f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645353Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645353Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"nicolay-r at SemEval-2024 Task 3: Using Flan-T5 for Reasoning Emotion Cause in Conversations with Chain-of-Thought on Emotion States","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Huizhi Liang, Nicolay Rusnachenko","submitted_at":"2024-04-04T11:03:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Emotion expression is one of the essential traits of conversations. It may be self-related or caused by another speaker. The variety of reasons may serve as a source of the further emotion causes: conversation history, speaker's emotional state, etc. Inspired by the most recent advances in Chain-of-Thought, in this work, we exploit the existing three-hop reasoning approach (THOR) to perform large language model instruction-tuning for answering: emotion states (THOR-state), and emotion caused by one speaker to the other (THOR-cause). We equip THOR-cause with the reasoning revision (rr) for devi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.03361","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.03361/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.03361","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.03361v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.03361","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JG5JNIJSCDLV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5I","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JG5JNIJS","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.08641","citing_title":"Reassessing the Role of Chain-of-Thought in Sentiment Analysis: Insights and Limitations","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JG5JNIJS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JG5JNIJS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.03361&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JG5JNIJSCDLVZI5IY6YXLSMH3O/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:04:24.645415+00:00"}