{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C","short_pith_number":"pith:JT6TMS7E","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4cfd364be4ccf92735fec196f01ff8d88ad1b88794b61dcc597c2afb56f6b294","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2304.07757","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revisiting Quantum Contextuality in an Algebraic Framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Mathias van den Bossche, Philippe Grangier","submitted_at":"2023-04-16T12:06:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Within the framework of quantum contextuality, we discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence, that allow one to relate Kochen-Specker's and Gleason's theorems. We emphasize that whereas Kochen-Specker's is essentially a no-go theorem, Gleason's provides a mathematical justification of Born's rule. Our extracontextual approach requires however a way to describe the ``Heisenberg cut''. Following an article by John von Neumann on infinite tensor products, this can be done by noticing that the usual formalism of quantum mechanics, associated with unitary equivalence of representation"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2304.07757","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2023-04-16T12:06:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"31a81842ecd4ef215d4ba9634ee134911ba7e1034494e5050a1c84c7f6cb540c","abstract_canon_sha256":"29914e522b23dd57d35ad68138f40756a35d6d455c6923b10c6fb2a2cff51d15"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993921Z","signature_b64":"BkkdHm0HVvBxkkHfh+Jjwzitsrx+nLEKl0a8jsu9DmN1j23UNsavve/bywOl+fqbmECZ2ERiEaCuk1GsfeDPAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4cfd364be4ccf92735fec196f01ff8d88ad1b88794b61dcc597c2afb56f6b294","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993518Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993518Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting Quantum Contextuality in an Algebraic Framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Mathias van den Bossche, Philippe Grangier","submitted_at":"2023-04-16T12:06:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Within the framework of quantum contextuality, we discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence, that allow one to relate Kochen-Specker's and Gleason's theorems. We emphasize that whereas Kochen-Specker's is essentially a no-go theorem, Gleason's provides a mathematical justification of Born's rule. Our extracontextual approach requires however a way to describe the ``Heisenberg cut''. Following an article by John von Neumann on infinite tensor products, this can be done by noticing that the usual formalism of quantum mechanics, associated with unitary equivalence of representation"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2304.07757","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2304.07757/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2304.07757","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2304.07757v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2304.07757","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JT6TMS7EZT4S","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JT6TMS7E","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01349","citing_title":"Is Quantum Mechanics Universal? EWF Experiments and Non Absoluteness of Events","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JT6TMS7E"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JT6TMS7E","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2304.07757&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JT6TMS7EZT4SONP6YGLPAH7Y3C/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:24.993574+00:00"}