{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7","short_pith_number":"pith:KQGGRD5V","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"540c688fb59761c03a885b6ebcec7a5fecc927e6311a6edf748fe07105ef1145","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.12731","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Normative Robustness as a Frontier for Non-Verifiable Reasoning in LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Anita Keshmirian, Benjamin Henke, Elizaveta Tennant, Julia Haas, Kristian Lum, Murray Shanahan, Sydney Levine, Verena Rieser","submitted_at":"2026-06-10T22:37:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"As LLMs increasingly serve in advisory and deliberative roles, users rely on them for non-verifiable reasoning in domains lacking objective ground truths. However, traditional evaluations of LLM reasoning focus almost exclusively on fact-based domains, such as mathematics and science, leaving uncertainty over whether and to what degree models can handle ambiguous, subjective, or value-laden problems over time. To address this concern, we propose moral reasoning as a paradigmatic subdomain of non-verifiable reasoning. We define moral robustness as a model's capacity to exhibit sound moral reaso"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.12731","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-06-10T22:37:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"5bf5b5e908d032865477d36dcce6b4bf512b29840e76c1c828abc9f8aa9a8703","abstract_canon_sha256":"c82794d4733023b4fe8eda24b739ef5b2ac09d3b2dec7cce171c7ad50665d346"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.857358Z","signature_b64":"hHdpsBBnNb01bAcpLf7v4rIXlg3JTipduA84Er7CGnd9JIK+ez5OzZ9eqTDyuncJJAJk2K5TEI7HfqH31Y45DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"540c688fb59761c03a885b6ebcec7a5fecc927e6311a6edf748fe07105ef1145","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856438Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856438Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Normative Robustness as a Frontier for Non-Verifiable Reasoning in LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Anita Keshmirian, Benjamin Henke, Elizaveta Tennant, Julia Haas, Kristian Lum, Murray Shanahan, Sydney Levine, Verena Rieser","submitted_at":"2026-06-10T22:37:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"As LLMs increasingly serve in advisory and deliberative roles, users rely on them for non-verifiable reasoning in domains lacking objective ground truths. However, traditional evaluations of LLM reasoning focus almost exclusively on fact-based domains, such as mathematics and science, leaving uncertainty over whether and to what degree models can handle ambiguous, subjective, or value-laden problems over time. To address this concern, we propose moral reasoning as a paradigmatic subdomain of non-verifiable reasoning. We define moral robustness as a model's capacity to exhibit sound moral reaso"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.12731","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.12731/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.12731","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.12731v1","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.12731","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KQGGRD5VS5Q4","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUI","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KQGGRD5V","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KQGGRD5V"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KQGGRD5V","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.12731&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KQGGRD5VS5Q4AOUILNXLZ3D2L7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-12T01:08:47.856589+00:00"}