{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT","short_pith_number":"pith:LABOWTWX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5802eb4ed7731f215a8286120c915b74e93f4992b027adf2433fe3e88d2d44f9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.02092","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparing Weak- and Unsupervised Methods for Resonant Anomaly Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Benjamin Nachman, David Shih, Jack H. Collins, Pablo Mart\\'in-Ramiro","submitted_at":"2021-04-05T18:00:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Anomaly detection techniques are growing in importance at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), motivated by the increasing need to search for new physics in a model-agnostic way. In this work, we provide a detailed comparative study between a well-studied unsupervised method called the autoencoder (AE) and a weakly-supervised approach based on the Classification Without Labels (CWoLa) technique. We examine the ability of the two methods to identify a new physics signal at different cross sections in a fully hadronic resonance search. By construction, the AE classification performance is independen"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.02092","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2021-04-05T18:00:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"0ebb182d442c307bfe7d0679da6e4901bbb96ac2b88910ba4baa4d48750e8fc1","abstract_canon_sha256":"82292ff1ca80cb1cf980c48c201e9bfe0a3a74f51089ce3511cb7ae04ad95927"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.230063Z","signature_b64":"fhO5gqZ5x+a3KF9qLp+58CKtjy6WNY5l9VKTTvTuktjwrPH1nJ3qDcQ97lDouPbWuLDT0E+vMbOqNFRgPK1HBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5802eb4ed7731f215a8286120c915b74e93f4992b027adf2433fe3e88d2d44f9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229636Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229636Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparing Weak- and Unsupervised Methods for Resonant Anomaly Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Benjamin Nachman, David Shih, Jack H. Collins, Pablo Mart\\'in-Ramiro","submitted_at":"2021-04-05T18:00:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Anomaly detection techniques are growing in importance at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), motivated by the increasing need to search for new physics in a model-agnostic way. In this work, we provide a detailed comparative study between a well-studied unsupervised method called the autoencoder (AE) and a weakly-supervised approach based on the Classification Without Labels (CWoLa) technique. We examine the ability of the two methods to identify a new physics signal at different cross sections in a fully hadronic resonance search. By construction, the AE classification performance is independen"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.02092","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.02092/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.02092","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.02092v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.02092","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LABOWTWXOMPS","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LABOWTWXOMPSCWUC","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LABOWTWX","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01354","citing_title":"Local Conformal Predictions for Calibrated Surrogates","ref_index":195,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LABOWTWX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LABOWTWX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.02092&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LABOWTWXOMPSCWUCQYJAZEK3OT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:00:52.229693+00:00"}