{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G","short_pith_number":"pith:MS6CV4OV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"64bc2af1d5a42b2bb52da3dd0bc9d4e18bc9e12b5fc0d57423c4c739b02f6c43","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.07570","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can LLMs extract scientific consensus? A case study in high-temperature superconductivity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Boris Kozinsky, Bowen Yu, Ching-Wu Chu, Ju Li, Liangzi Deng, Mingda Li, Mouyang Cheng, Pavel Volkov, Wenhao He, Xiao-Gang Wen, Yao Wang, Zhuotao Jin","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T03:52:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Scientific knowledge is increasingly dispersed across vast and heterogeneous scientific literature, where important claims are often implicit, evolving, and internally debated. While large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in information extraction and summarization, their ability to recover latent scientific consensus remains unclear. Here, we investigate this problem in the context of high-temperature superconductivity (HTS), a long-standing and highly debated topic in condensed matter physics, as a challenging testbed. Using near 18,000 highly-cited publications over "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.07570","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T03:52:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"c8244efecac86a4f8bad3d26b30888a8b0b8619ebfd22daa8cedb7b345cecfb0","abstract_canon_sha256":"befcf0b018fb6b0a918b9ffb4f89047b97727f8c1ed22bab6dde8f2e5af6342f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364752Z","signature_b64":"Beax4WmkYtfrLRLjibbQgkkl7UiGv4fPCcl7/eZnqPrvFbbUX8qGfG3vvmE6GU/7PkShFRpBCY7O/a9AGCGCDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"64bc2af1d5a42b2bb52da3dd0bc9d4e18bc9e12b5fc0d57423c4c739b02f6c43","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364132Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364132Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can LLMs extract scientific consensus? A case study in high-temperature superconductivity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Boris Kozinsky, Bowen Yu, Ching-Wu Chu, Ju Li, Liangzi Deng, Mingda Li, Mouyang Cheng, Pavel Volkov, Wenhao He, Xiao-Gang Wen, Yao Wang, Zhuotao Jin","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T03:52:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Scientific knowledge is increasingly dispersed across vast and heterogeneous scientific literature, where important claims are often implicit, evolving, and internally debated. While large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in information extraction and summarization, their ability to recover latent scientific consensus remains unclear. Here, we investigate this problem in the context of high-temperature superconductivity (HTS), a long-standing and highly debated topic in condensed matter physics, as a challenging testbed. Using near 18,000 highly-cited publications over "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.07570","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.07570/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.07570","created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.07570v1","created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.07570","created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MS6CV4OVUQVS","created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJN","created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MS6CV4OV","created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MS6CV4OV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MS6CV4OV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.07570&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MS6CV4OVUQVSXNJNUPOQXSOU4G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-09T00:04:43.364223+00:00"}