{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q","short_pith_number":"pith:N4VDSXE7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6f2a395c9fd525786de0286fa39c72d42cb9f71275118065de3813744af6c966","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.08896","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LLMJudge: LLMs for Relevance Judgments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Bhaskar Mitra, Charles L. A. Clarke, Clemencia Siro, Emine Yilmaz, Guglielmo Faggioli, Hossein A. Rahmani, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Nick Craswell, Paul Thomas","submitted_at":"2024-08-09T23:15:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"The LLMJudge challenge is organized as part of the LLM4Eval workshop at SIGIR 2024. Test collections are essential for evaluating information retrieval (IR) systems. The evaluation and tuning of a search system is largely based on relevance labels, which indicate whether a document is useful for a specific search and user. However, collecting relevance judgments on a large scale is costly and resource-intensive. Consequently, typical experiments rely on third-party labelers who may not always produce accurate annotations. The LLMJudge challenge aims to explore an alternative approach by using "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.08896","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2024-08-09T23:15:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"05765fc76ce8fee0d4212d0e7b870f2624f831af879314a378f968b93cfed05e","abstract_canon_sha256":"40cb4d5aa722e28131d85108f603fac95cae0483fb8e699e5f51e01c8f34e4a6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183313Z","signature_b64":"cFg+8ohTK+6QxXP8xk5+dgSFVVHEYFqJow2db+jkghOzZUDvMfzVs4E8IcyhN8wAQgUb3ESdvX026J83nPWrAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6f2a395c9fd525786de0286fa39c72d42cb9f71275118065de3813744af6c966","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.182954Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.182954Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LLMJudge: LLMs for Relevance Judgments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Bhaskar Mitra, Charles L. A. Clarke, Clemencia Siro, Emine Yilmaz, Guglielmo Faggioli, Hossein A. Rahmani, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Nick Craswell, Paul Thomas","submitted_at":"2024-08-09T23:15:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"The LLMJudge challenge is organized as part of the LLM4Eval workshop at SIGIR 2024. Test collections are essential for evaluating information retrieval (IR) systems. The evaluation and tuning of a search system is largely based on relevance labels, which indicate whether a document is useful for a specific search and user. However, collecting relevance judgments on a large scale is costly and resource-intensive. Consequently, typical experiments rely on third-party labelers who may not always produce accurate annotations. The LLMJudge challenge aims to explore an alternative approach by using "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.08896","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.08896/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.08896","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.08896v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.08896","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N4VDSXE72USX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N4VDSXE72USXQ3PA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N4VDSXE7","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.05579","citing_title":"LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods","ref_index":189,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N4VDSXE7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N4VDSXE7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.08896&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N4VDSXE72USXQ3PAFBX2HHDS2Q/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:25.183016+00:00"}