{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR","short_pith_number":"pith:O2425TOG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"76b9aecdc6a087779f0ed946e10c6d1c6e38217dd66809e2dbf7ffcf6cf8b855","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1607.02411","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Has the QCD critical point been observed at RHIC? - A Rebuttal","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"nucl-ex","authors_text":"Roy A. Lacey (Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University)","submitted_at":"2016-07-08T15:24:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"This note rebuts an old, but recurring claim by Antoniou, Davis and Diakonos [1] that the critical point and associated critical exponents reported in Ref. [2], is based on an erroneous treatment of scaling relations near the critical point."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1607.02411","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"nucl-ex","submitted_at":"2016-07-08T15:24:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["nucl-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"31bd64fb480ef9d9d0aa0c3ec408c97409bb824dd4040ce5c7f219fc99104c2d","abstract_canon_sha256":"beb9a536921bf63a72f4b151be0b7b7cd068b74f2c9d704f6714155e44dbdb97"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450521Z","signature_b64":"qu7ufPnTiEEL9dm+tjdT1/1E69zroN3S9s93Mlzt+vvVAG7MKQeAKjS7xrt8wlsI8gDplwT/z4lX9k1FF8wiCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"76b9aecdc6a087779f0ed946e10c6d1c6e38217dd66809e2dbf7ffcf6cf8b855","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450018Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450018Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Has the QCD critical point been observed at RHIC? - A Rebuttal","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"nucl-ex","authors_text":"Roy A. Lacey (Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University)","submitted_at":"2016-07-08T15:24:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"This note rebuts an old, but recurring claim by Antoniou, Davis and Diakonos [1] that the critical point and associated critical exponents reported in Ref. [2], is based on an erroneous treatment of scaling relations near the critical point."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1607.02411","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1607.02411","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450107+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1607.02411v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450107+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1607.02411","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450107+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"O2425TOGUCDX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:36.002864+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"O2425TOGUCDXPHYO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:36.002864+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"O2425TOG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:36.002864+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O2425TOG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O2425TOG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1607.02411&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/O2425TOGUCDXPHYO3FDOCDDNDR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450107+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:20.450107+00:00"}