{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF","short_pith_number":"pith:O44MIPIV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7738c43d15b62cd9d38f428414f6df1940975bdf322e2989c3630863128e2842","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1907.12875","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Refined corrections let Planck 2018 use full polarization data and tighten LambdaCDM constraints by 20-30 percent.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"A. A. Fraisse, A. Challinor, A. De Rosa, A. Ducout, A. Frolov, A. Gruppuso, A. H. Jaffe, A. J. Banday, A. Lasenby, A. Lewis, A. Mangilli, A. Marcos-Caballero, A. Melchiorri, A. Mennella, A. Moneti, A. Moss, A. Renzi, A.-S. Suur-Uski, A. Zacchei, A. Zonca, B. Casaponsa, B. D. Wandelt, B. Partridge, B. P. Crill, B. Ruiz-Granados, B. Van Tent, C. Baccigalupi, C. Burigana, C. Combet, C. R. Lawrence, C. Rosset, C. Sirignano, D. Herranz, D. Maino, D. Molinari, D. Paoletti, D. Scott, D. Tavagnacco, E. Calabrese, E. Di Valentino, E. Franceschi, E. Hivon, E. Keih\\\"anen, E. Mart\\'inez-Gonz\\'alez, E. P. S. Shellard, F. Boulanger, F. Cuttaia, F. Elsner, F. Finelli, F. K. Hansen, F. Levrier, F. Perrotta, F. Piacentini, F. R. Bouchet, F. Villa, G. de Zotti, G. Efstathiou, G. Lagache, G. Maggio, G. Morgante, G. Patanchon, G. Polenta, G. Rocha, G. Roudier, G. Sirri, H. C. Chiang, H. K. Eriksen, H. Kurki-Suonio, H. U. N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen, H. V. Peiris, I. K. Wehus, J. A. Rubi\\~no-Mart\\'in, J. A. Tauber, J. Aumont, J. Borrill, J. Carron, J. Delabrouille, J. D. McEwen, J. E. Gudmundsson, J.-F. Cardoso, J. F. Mac\\'ias-P\\'erez, J. Gonz\\'alez-Nuevo, J. Hamann, J. J. Bock, J. Kim, J.-L. Puget, J.-M. Delouis, J. M. Diego, J.-M. Lamarre, J.-P. Bernard, J. P. Rachen, J. R. Bond, J. Valiviita, K. Benabed, K. Ganga, K. Kiiveri, K. M. G\\'orski, L. D. Spencer, L. Montier, L. Pagano, L. P. L. Colombo, L. Salvati, L. Toffolatti, M.-A. Miville-Desch\\^enes, M. Ashdown, M. Ballardini, M. Bersanelli, M. Bucher, M. Douspis, M. Frailis, M. Gerbino, M. Kunz, M. Lattanzi, M. Le Jeune, M. Liguori, M. Lilley, M. L\\'opez-Caniego, M. Maris, M. Migliaccio, M. Millea, M. Reinecke, M. Remazeilles, M. Sandri, M. Savelainen, M. Tenti, M. Tomasi, N. Bartolo, N. Krachmalnicoff, N. Mandolesi, N. Mauri, N. Vittorio, O. Dor\\'e, P. Bielewicz, P. B. Lilje, P. De Bernardis, P. G. Martin, Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, P. M. Lubin, P. Natoli, P. R. Meinhold, P. Vielva, R. B. Barreiro, R. C. Butler, R. Fernandez-Cobos, R. Keskitalo, R. Sunyaev, R. T. G\\'enova-Santos, S. Basak, S. Dusini, S. Galeotta, S. Galli, S. Gratton, S. Matarrese, T. A. En{\\ss}lin, T. Ghosh, T. S. Kisner, T. Trombetti, V. Lindholm, V. Pettorino, W. C. Jones, W. Handley, X. Dupac, Y. Akrami, Y. Fantaye, Y. Giraud-H\\'eraud, Y.-Z. Ma, Z. Huang","submitted_at":"2019-07-30T13:11:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements. With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains the reionization optical-depth parameter $\\tau$ to better than 15% (in combination with with the other low- and high-$\\ell$ likelihoods). We also up"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1907.12875","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2019-07-30T13:11:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"11607f336c01dfe0b57246f68ec75a5ee76275457bc00f0a5a1ef24f04d32ca9","abstract_canon_sha256":"939c83bbafe15ba83e510b28d3754a4f01df629f20fceca1b4166363f138c5c2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.030280Z","signature_b64":"g7U9aNdhnWkr6VU/SE5ammxqYlb6QfDhS6qoHCHJaRptyimKrdza3XLIFHn01KvX7m0IOMROudQiiEHKTYatCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7738c43d15b62cd9d38f428414f6df1940975bdf322e2989c3630863128e2842","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029716Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029716Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Refined corrections let Planck 2018 use full polarization data and tighten LambdaCDM constraints by 20-30 percent.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"A. A. Fraisse, A. Challinor, A. De Rosa, A. Ducout, A. Frolov, A. Gruppuso, A. H. Jaffe, A. J. Banday, A. Lasenby, A. Lewis, A. Mangilli, A. Marcos-Caballero, A. Melchiorri, A. Mennella, A. Moneti, A. Moss, A. Renzi, A.-S. Suur-Uski, A. Zacchei, A. Zonca, B. Casaponsa, B. D. Wandelt, B. Partridge, B. P. Crill, B. Ruiz-Granados, B. Van Tent, C. Baccigalupi, C. Burigana, C. Combet, C. R. Lawrence, C. Rosset, C. Sirignano, D. Herranz, D. Maino, D. Molinari, D. Paoletti, D. Scott, D. Tavagnacco, E. Calabrese, E. Di Valentino, E. Franceschi, E. Hivon, E. Keih\\\"anen, E. Mart\\'inez-Gonz\\'alez, E. P. S. Shellard, F. Boulanger, F. Cuttaia, F. Elsner, F. Finelli, F. K. Hansen, F. Levrier, F. Perrotta, F. Piacentini, F. R. Bouchet, F. Villa, G. de Zotti, G. Efstathiou, G. Lagache, G. Maggio, G. Morgante, G. Patanchon, G. Polenta, G. Rocha, G. Roudier, G. Sirri, H. C. Chiang, H. K. Eriksen, H. Kurki-Suonio, H. U. N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen, H. V. Peiris, I. K. Wehus, J. A. Rubi\\~no-Mart\\'in, J. A. Tauber, J. Aumont, J. Borrill, J. Carron, J. Delabrouille, J. D. McEwen, J. E. Gudmundsson, J.-F. Cardoso, J. F. Mac\\'ias-P\\'erez, J. Gonz\\'alez-Nuevo, J. Hamann, J. J. Bock, J. Kim, J.-L. Puget, J.-M. Delouis, J. M. Diego, J.-M. Lamarre, J.-P. Bernard, J. P. Rachen, J. R. Bond, J. Valiviita, K. Benabed, K. Ganga, K. Kiiveri, K. M. G\\'orski, L. D. Spencer, L. Montier, L. Pagano, L. P. L. Colombo, L. Salvati, L. Toffolatti, M.-A. Miville-Desch\\^enes, M. Ashdown, M. Ballardini, M. Bersanelli, M. Bucher, M. Douspis, M. Frailis, M. Gerbino, M. Kunz, M. Lattanzi, M. Le Jeune, M. Liguori, M. Lilley, M. L\\'opez-Caniego, M. Maris, M. Migliaccio, M. Millea, M. Reinecke, M. Remazeilles, M. Sandri, M. Savelainen, M. Tenti, M. Tomasi, N. Bartolo, N. Krachmalnicoff, N. Mandolesi, N. Mauri, N. Vittorio, O. Dor\\'e, P. Bielewicz, P. B. Lilje, P. De Bernardis, P. G. Martin, Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, P. M. Lubin, P. Natoli, P. R. Meinhold, P. Vielva, R. B. Barreiro, R. C. Butler, R. Fernandez-Cobos, R. Keskitalo, R. Sunyaev, R. T. G\\'enova-Santos, S. Basak, S. Dusini, S. Galeotta, S. Galli, S. Gratton, S. Matarrese, T. A. En{\\ss}lin, T. Ghosh, T. S. Kisner, T. Trombetti, V. Lindholm, V. Pettorino, W. C. Jones, W. Handley, X. Dupac, Y. Akrami, Y. Fantaye, Y. Giraud-H\\'eraud, Y.-Z. Ma, Z. Huang","submitted_at":"2019-07-30T13:11:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements. With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains the reionization optical-depth parameter $\\tau$ to better than 15% (in combination with with the other low- and high-$\\ell$ likelihoods). We also up"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Overall, the legacy Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological model and represent a reference for future CMB observations.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The accuracy of the polarization efficiency (PE) modelling is the main limitation, with residual modelling uncertainties remaining after corrections for temperature-to-polarization leakage and channel calibrations.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Planck 2018 likelihoods incorporate improved polarization modeling and simulations to deliver 20-30% tighter Lambda-CDM constraints than temperature-only analyses while maintaining consistency below 0.5 sigma.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Refined corrections let Planck 2018 use full polarization data and tighten LambdaCDM constraints by 20-30 percent.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"30e703471e1bb4d915e6c8ebd7beec06dce14f8c4f55f3e1f51e42ac4266ca7d"},"source":{"id":"1907.12875","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"498446ab-50e0-41c3-96c5-b15084005f67","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T21:53:13.209166Z","strongest_claim":"Overall, the legacy Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological model and represent a reference for future CMB observations.","one_line_summary":"Planck 2018 likelihoods incorporate improved polarization modeling and simulations to deliver 20-30% tighter Lambda-CDM constraints than temperature-only analyses while maintaining consistency below 0.5 sigma.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The accuracy of the polarization efficiency (PE) modelling is the main limitation, with residual modelling uncertainties remaining after corrections for temperature-to-polarization leakage and channel calibrations.","pith_extraction_headline":"Refined corrections let Planck 2018 use full polarization data and tighten LambdaCDM constraints by 20-30 percent."},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1907.12875","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1907.12875v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1907.12875","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"O44MIPIVWYWN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:24.271573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"O44MIPIVWYWNTU4P","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:24.271573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"O44MIPIV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:24.271573+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":42,"internal_anchor_count":42,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23841","citing_title":"cloelike: A Python Library for Cosmological Likelihood Inference in the Euclid Era","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.07970","citing_title":"MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST) Science White Paper I: Overview of Large-Scale Structure Cosmology in the Era of Stage-V Spectroscopic Surveys","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.17047","citing_title":"Generalized neutrino isocurvature","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.08761","citing_title":"The CMB Cold Spot under the lens II: Lensing signatures in polarization and cosmic texture footprints","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22309","citing_title":"Signatures of Modified Gravity Below $\\mathcal{O}(10)$ Mpc in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background","ref_index":125,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.05472","citing_title":"The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.03568","citing_title":"Observational constraints on Luciano-Saridakis entropic cosmology","ref_index":105,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25373","citing_title":"Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16994","citing_title":"Determination of the best dark matter profile for the Milky Way with Gaia DR3 using Bayesian Model Comparison","ref_index":67,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.22066","citing_title":"Cosmic Strings as Dynamical Dark Energy: Novel Constraints","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2105.13549","citing_title":"Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing","ref_index":184,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2006.11237","citing_title":"2020 Global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture","ref_index":112,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09981","citing_title":"New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.01759","citing_title":"Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.10439","citing_title":"Constraints of dynamical dark energy models from different observational datasets","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.18657","citing_title":"How Complex is Dark Energy? A Bayesian Analysis of CPL Extensions with Recent DESI BAO Measurements","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.20383","citing_title":"A Spectrum of Cosmological Rips and Their Observational Signatures","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2205.10869","citing_title":"CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2206.07773","citing_title":"CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.02077","citing_title":"Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity","ref_index":97,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14744","citing_title":"Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.21432","citing_title":"Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.12022","citing_title":"DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements","ref_index":88,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2002.12778","citing_title":"Constraints on Primordial Black Holes","ref_index":212,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14088","citing_title":"Single field matter bounce with dark energy era: comparison with CMB Planck 2018 data and best fit parameters","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O44MIPIV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O44MIPIV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1907.12875&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/O44MIPIVWYWNTU4PIKCBJ5W7DF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029801+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.029801+00:00"}