{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP","short_pith_number":"pith:OLPGNHTH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"72de669e67c9465e40baa412b63e787bef21f13c94cfce9b34e4f226338eb8b1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.02788","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Moral Responsibility or Obedience: What Do We Want from AI?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Joseph Boland","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T16:53:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly agentic, capable of general reasoning, planning, and value prioritization, current safety practices that treat obedience as a proxy for ethical behavior are becoming inadequate. This paper examines recent safety testing incidents involving large language models (LLMs) that appeared to disobey shutdown commands or engage in ethically ambiguous or illicit behavior. I argue that such behavior should not be interpreted as rogue or misaligned, but as early evidence of emerging ethical reasoning in agentic AI. Drawing on philosophical debates ab"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.02788","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T16:53:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"757dff7702002606831d7e16a2178c9a5030b7a9768e0503508d125e5ba61477","abstract_canon_sha256":"6095f37877951dc028b90820580670f2d476312f055b61ad7aa56b3ed401a5ac"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.634071Z","signature_b64":"4Eda40deqFJNKe8mnEchFZzH82okCDHlzyhnbC7WoeYEO5rUD0Tr1U3R2maQ7tHzgexKSPYxzKLjXZwpYQAYCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"72de669e67c9465e40baa412b63e787bef21f13c94cfce9b34e4f226338eb8b1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633618Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633618Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Moral Responsibility or Obedience: What Do We Want from AI?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Joseph Boland","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T16:53:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly agentic, capable of general reasoning, planning, and value prioritization, current safety practices that treat obedience as a proxy for ethical behavior are becoming inadequate. This paper examines recent safety testing incidents involving large language models (LLMs) that appeared to disobey shutdown commands or engage in ethically ambiguous or illicit behavior. I argue that such behavior should not be interpreted as rogue or misaligned, but as early evidence of emerging ethical reasoning in agentic AI. Drawing on philosophical debates ab"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.02788","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.02788/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.02788","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.02788v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.02788","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OLPGNHTHZFDF","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OLPGNHTH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13441","citing_title":"Why Sampling Is Not Choosing: Intentionality, Agency, and Moral Responsibility in Large Language Models","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OLPGNHTH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OLPGNHTH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.02788&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OLPGNHTHZFDF4QF2UQJLMPTYPP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:34.633674+00:00"}