{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN","short_pith_number":"pith:OVQB4RPL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"75601e45eb055e20e4a819494f4030137c684f8243f0adb4207b3b50005004de","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.03655","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Non-Monotonic Entailment in Propositional Defeasible Standpoint Logic","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Ivan Varzniczak, Nicholas Leisegang, Thomas Meyer","submitted_at":"2026-06-02T13:44:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent work in defeasible reasoning has seen notions of preferential semantics and entailment in the style of Kraus et al. applied to modal logics. However, work in this field has focussed primarily on satisfiability checking, and monotonic notions of entailment, which may be inferentially weak. One particular modal logic where this has been introduced is propositional standpoint logics, where modalities can express the views of different viewpoints. This has resulted in the formalisation of propositional defeasible standpoint logic (PDSL). In this paper, we propose a means of lifting the clas"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.03655","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-06-02T13:44:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"1e85d8167344bc53721ae9660a50d27fd5f808b46ce875ceb995c4647da02054","abstract_canon_sha256":"65bd46b0ffc00e63305889d43022192de4838f8986bb5992050ecda4511aafc3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652668Z","signature_b64":"SztQIblvQUhlq49r7USYq0zxT+vEnrT6ePmcIOGu8s0nfpHishDVWuokHH2UQF9bJpJviPc7fvcTTEw7CEeOCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"75601e45eb055e20e4a819494f4030137c684f8243f0adb4207b3b50005004de","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652257Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652257Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Non-Monotonic Entailment in Propositional Defeasible Standpoint Logic","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Ivan Varzniczak, Nicholas Leisegang, Thomas Meyer","submitted_at":"2026-06-02T13:44:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent work in defeasible reasoning has seen notions of preferential semantics and entailment in the style of Kraus et al. applied to modal logics. However, work in this field has focussed primarily on satisfiability checking, and monotonic notions of entailment, which may be inferentially weak. One particular modal logic where this has been introduced is propositional standpoint logics, where modalities can express the views of different viewpoints. This has resulted in the formalisation of propositional defeasible standpoint logic (PDSL). In this paper, we propose a means of lifting the clas"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.03655","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.03655/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.03655","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.03655v1","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.03655","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OVQB4RPLAVPC","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFI","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OVQB4RPL","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OVQB4RPL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OVQB4RPL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.03655&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OVQB4RPLAVPCBZFIDFEU6QBQCN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-03T01:06:03.652321+00:00"}