{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL","short_pith_number":"pith:PJ7FKCQF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7a7e550a0525dde6a719229d8c4816a2eb233ae2eadf15f0ceb31f98e138d4fe","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1810.01092","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Relating Metric Distortion and Fairness of Social Choice Rules","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Anilesh K. Krishnaswamy, Ashish Goel, Reyna Hulett","submitted_at":"2018-10-02T07:03:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"One way of evaluating social choice (voting) rules is through a utilitarian distortion framework. In this model, we assume that agents submit full rankings over the alternatives, and these rankings are generated from underlying, but unknown, quantitative costs. The \\emph{distortion} of a social choice rule is then the ratio of the total social cost of the chosen alternative to the optimal social cost of any alternative; since the true costs are unknown, we consider the worst-case distortion over all possible underlying costs. Analogously, we can consider the worst-case \\emph{fairness ratio} of"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1810.01092","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2018-10-02T07:03:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5051ac4884d9877ef2f8eba34e3230748aa557a8a6f9f4be1d3650bc433a4486","abstract_canon_sha256":"de84d05d596638ca31d4f82c417f9277d69a1af9640996368c158e0d0c604a68"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871865Z","signature_b64":"zGokj14cAd5MGt1Sr5SYDjlhWF98tkzP9+CZqTLI/3/6EVbHGdx6iwQtsnlx6QV9B39Oh7TeUfkvKZ7xeEvTDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7a7e550a0525dde6a719229d8c4816a2eb233ae2eadf15f0ceb31f98e138d4fe","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871124Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871124Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Relating Metric Distortion and Fairness of Social Choice Rules","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Anilesh K. Krishnaswamy, Ashish Goel, Reyna Hulett","submitted_at":"2018-10-02T07:03:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"One way of evaluating social choice (voting) rules is through a utilitarian distortion framework. In this model, we assume that agents submit full rankings over the alternatives, and these rankings are generated from underlying, but unknown, quantitative costs. The \\emph{distortion} of a social choice rule is then the ratio of the total social cost of the chosen alternative to the optimal social cost of any alternative; since the true costs are unknown, we consider the worst-case distortion over all possible underlying costs. Analogously, we can consider the worst-case \\emph{fairness ratio} of"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1810.01092","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1810.01092","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871225+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1810.01092v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871225+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1810.01092","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871225+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PJ7FKCQFEXO6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:43.782077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:43.782077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PJ7FKCQF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:43.782077+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PJ7FKCQF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PJ7FKCQF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1810.01092&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PJ7FKCQFEXO6NJYZEKOYYSAWUL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871225+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:18.871225+00:00"}