{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA","short_pith_number":"pith:PS6KDCRP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7cbca18a2fb1dbfb325d904d2c4533a82ecd774e912f6173d23187ebab29fdbd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.02219","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Normative Framework for Benchmarking Consumer Fairness in Large Language Model Recommender System","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Fatemeh Nazary, Yashar Deldjoo","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T16:25:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in recommender systems (RS) presents new challenges in understanding and evaluating their biases, which can result in unfairness or the amplification of stereotypes. Traditional fairness evaluations in RS primarily focus on collaborative filtering (CF) settings, which may not fully capture the complexities of LLMs, as these models often inherit biases from large, unregulated data. This paper proposes a normative framework to benchmark consumer fairness in LLM-powered recommender systems (RecLLMs).\n  We critically examine how fairness norms in "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.02219","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T16:25:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"1ed7744800ed1e2f4f652d9f1dd4d27f3152d831266289ce2bba8b81561d390c","abstract_canon_sha256":"1c9f145a959fbde3cc58730ad52ce1bd03df4806ddb9094c1d700e83ef2818de"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.574357Z","signature_b64":"SGF9LYic0GQVGvElpk4OpGfOfU0mNdc1/c/efvwJrTpvAMoyQuR0i1RWetCDqTpfDLaBfXV8MfSNok27c0AaAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7cbca18a2fb1dbfb325d904d2c4533a82ecd774e912f6173d23187ebab29fdbd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573858Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573858Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Normative Framework for Benchmarking Consumer Fairness in Large Language Model Recommender System","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Fatemeh Nazary, Yashar Deldjoo","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T16:25:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in recommender systems (RS) presents new challenges in understanding and evaluating their biases, which can result in unfairness or the amplification of stereotypes. Traditional fairness evaluations in RS primarily focus on collaborative filtering (CF) settings, which may not fully capture the complexities of LLMs, as these models often inherit biases from large, unregulated data. This paper proposes a normative framework to benchmark consumer fairness in LLM-powered recommender systems (RecLLMs).\n  We critically examine how fairness norms in "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.02219","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.02219/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.02219","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.02219v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.02219","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"PS6KDCRPWHN7","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"PS6KDCRP","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00540","citing_title":"Trustworthy Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25032","citing_title":"Offline Evaluation Measures of Fairness in Recommender Systems","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PS6KDCRP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/PS6KDCRP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.02219&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/PS6KDCRPWHN7WMS5SBGSYRJTVA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:35.573910+00:00"}