{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA","short_pith_number":"pith:RHCC7XV2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"89c42fdebaac73a05eb72223febc25603a255ce8638c07279874b16a93e48f81","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1703.08397","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reasoning by Cases in Structured Argumentation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Christian Stra{\\ss}er, Jesse Heyninck, Mathieu Beirlaen","submitted_at":"2017-03-24T13:00:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"We extend the $ASPIC^+$ framework for structured argumentation so as to allow applications of the reasoning by cases inference scheme for defeasible arguments. Given an argument with conclusion `$A$ or $B$', an argument based on $A$ with conclusion $C$, and an argument based on $B$ with conclusion $C$, we allow the construction of an argument with conclusion $C$. We show how our framework leads to different results than other approaches in non-monotonic logic for dealing with disjunctive information, such as disjunctive default theory or approaches based on the OR-rule (which allows to derive "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1703.08397","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2017-03-24T13:00:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0a651857636fe301b53bae12b8280ff96ef9727fdcdabfde3e4ae37af96a6ec9","abstract_canon_sha256":"10ef7da79e9517d07138b4d26b3dd91039263b26cec69bd78ac45a16f3a11247"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039548Z","signature_b64":"7PAD06WA5r0PKUIHZNDDOVECOzoyuB1zfnyp9moNeW9wanABPHhhr7FXkohLNYwHa0KeufMSKmGmIFRzHpARDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"89c42fdebaac73a05eb72223febc25603a255ce8638c07279874b16a93e48f81","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039029Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039029Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reasoning by Cases in Structured Argumentation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Christian Stra{\\ss}er, Jesse Heyninck, Mathieu Beirlaen","submitted_at":"2017-03-24T13:00:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"We extend the $ASPIC^+$ framework for structured argumentation so as to allow applications of the reasoning by cases inference scheme for defeasible arguments. Given an argument with conclusion `$A$ or $B$', an argument based on $A$ with conclusion $C$, and an argument based on $B$ with conclusion $C$, we allow the construction of an argument with conclusion $C$. We show how our framework leads to different results than other approaches in non-monotonic logic for dealing with disjunctive information, such as disjunctive default theory or approaches based on the OR-rule (which allows to derive "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1703.08397","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1703.08397","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039111+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1703.08397v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039111+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1703.08397","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039111+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RHCC7XV2VRZ2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:39.905425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:39.905425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RHCC7XV2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:39.905425+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RHCC7XV2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RHCC7XV2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1703.08397&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RHCC7XV2VRZ2AXVXEIR75PBFMA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039111+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:48:00.039111+00:00"}