{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT","short_pith_number":"pith:SGWRY4UV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"91ad1c72950d4bcb2b540dbae1a1ca34ef0601c97e2b4cd5a67e204a412d9bb8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.04035","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Mutual Reputation and Trust in a Repeated Sender-Receiver Game","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Georgy Lukyanov","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T09:12:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study a repeated sender-receiver game where inspections are public but the sender's action is hidden unless inspected. A detected deception ends the relationship or triggers a finite punishment. We show the public state is one dimensional and prove existence of a stationary equilibrium with cutoff inspection and monotone deception. The sender's mixing pins down a closed-form total inspection probability at the cutoff, and a finite punishment phase implements the same cutoffs as termination. We extend to noisy checks, silent audits, and rare public alarms, preserving the Markov structure and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.04035","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.TH","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T09:12:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8f2b743e727ac5020590f8b3fb3045fb1f038b191892ee29b292318362bc4153","abstract_canon_sha256":"fac2cd5be56802df093202d24b36f4ee1465d3406bcaaafc45b55ef101749913"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158867Z","signature_b64":"Ed6RA56Xd79UEePxoxQvtTytiQMg3tnlMZDYqDuf3OURmdDWuI7eJz/pl9vERbOHpYFWtWlk9vWB9kxYhnJHAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"91ad1c72950d4bcb2b540dbae1a1ca34ef0601c97e2b4cd5a67e204a412d9bb8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158234Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158234Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Mutual Reputation and Trust in a Repeated Sender-Receiver Game","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Georgy Lukyanov","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T09:12:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study a repeated sender-receiver game where inspections are public but the sender's action is hidden unless inspected. A detected deception ends the relationship or triggers a finite punishment. We show the public state is one dimensional and prove existence of a stationary equilibrium with cutoff inspection and monotone deception. The sender's mixing pins down a closed-form total inspection probability at the cutoff, and a finite punishment phase implements the same cutoffs as termination. We extend to noisy checks, silent audits, and rare public alarms, preserving the Markov structure and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.04035","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.04035/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.04035","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.04035v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.04035","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SGWRY4UVBVF4","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2U","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SGWRY4UV","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.00068","citing_title":"Hope, Signals, and Silicon: A Game-Theoretic Model of the Pre-Doctoral Academic Labor Market in the Age of AI","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SGWRY4UV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SGWRY4UV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.04035&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SGWRY4UVBVF4WK2UBW5ODIOKGT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:52.158309+00:00"}