{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:UDPW66L53WAAI3MUFJDMK2HW6K","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"dccbd01f8e79e34db6927b2c5b43dbc1e57577670dc997d97f32aa62b9877006","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.NT","submitted_at":"2026-01-03T00:59:06Z","title_canon_sha256":"ee1502157baf5f55e99ecc065c9d72082d7cbed3db7d9ddfed5e15b88cf7ba83"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2601.01019","kind":"arxiv","version":8}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.01019","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.01019v8","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.01019","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UDPW66L53WAA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UDPW66L53WAAI3MU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UDPW66L5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:6f8b133163a93a5ae242e52bd3538e8fd2b8ca0383533d660107dbeca1f5ef66","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"We give two proofs of the transcendence of e based on FPS. The first of them is a specialization of the 1990 proof by Beukers, Bézivin and Robba of the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem. The second proof is due to this author and is an adaptation of Hilbert's argument to FPS."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the algebraic operations on formal power series can fully replicate the key contradiction steps of Hilbert's analytic proof without requiring any convergence or analytic continuation properties."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Two formal power series proofs establish the transcendence of e: one specializes a 1990 Lindemann-Weierstrass proof, and the other adapts Hilbert's argument algebraically."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The transcendence of e follows from algebraic operations on formal power series alone."}],"snapshot_sha256":"920c3ee449bba74dd17a60e69125b2dd26d2d574d225c12bf247599bd9dc0f4b"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"0a4b8afb14206842e41bb3181cd7e60a4ecf3ad406bab94eaaea165ddfaa2748"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"We review Hilbert's classical analytical proof of the transcendence of the number $\\mathrm{e}$. Then, we show how this result can be obtained algebraically by means of formal power series (FPS). We give two proofs of the transcendence of $\\mathrm{e}$ based on FPS. The first of them is a specialization of the 1990 proof by Beukers, B\\'ezivin and Robba of the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem. The second proof is due to this author and is an adaptation of Hilbert's argument to FPS.","authors_text":"Martin Klazar","cross_cats":[],"headline":"The transcendence of e follows from algebraic operations on formal power series alone.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.NT","submitted_at":"2026-01-03T00:59:06Z","title":"The transcendence of $\\mathrm{e}$ via formal power series"},"references":{"count":0,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":0,"sample":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.01019","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-16T18:32:47.250313Z","id":"6c36488e-9166-43d0-9159-303ee2c6cb21","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Two formal power series proofs establish the transcendence of e: one specializes a 1990 Lindemann-Weierstrass proof, and the other adapts Hilbert's argument algebraically.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"The transcendence of e follows from algebraic operations on formal power series alone.","strongest_claim":"We give two proofs of the transcendence of e based on FPS. The first of them is a specialization of the 1990 proof by Beukers, Bézivin and Robba of the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem. The second proof is due to this author and is an adaptation of Hilbert's argument to FPS.","weakest_assumption":"That the algebraic operations on formal power series can fully replicate the key contradiction steps of Hilbert's analytic proof without requiring any convergence or analytic continuation properties."}},"verdict_id":"6c36488e-9166-43d0-9159-303ee2c6cb21"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:c1fec3396328340caf27238ecc6f92dd9e48e2396130ad51be0d1ad9a5a5609f","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"dccbd01f8e79e34db6927b2c5b43dbc1e57577670dc997d97f32aa62b9877006","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.NT","submitted_at":"2026-01-03T00:59:06Z","title_canon_sha256":"ee1502157baf5f55e99ecc065c9d72082d7cbed3db7d9ddfed5e15b88cf7ba83"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2601.01019","kind":"arxiv","version":8}},"canonical_sha256":"a0df6f797ddd80046d942a46c568f6f2a6398336f64fda174163a1ceb9f3f6da","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"a0df6f797ddd80046d942a46c568f6f2a6398336f64fda174163a1ceb9f3f6da","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16.741580Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16.741580Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"1j60DduW7fXL5zlgR4BISAqSD3/j21bKuNnd9LQ+O724uHTzZI9EFUnj4yxxl8J8ODHAwzRIFPh3evFtfyXsBw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:16.742309Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2601.01019","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":8}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:c1fec3396328340caf27238ecc6f92dd9e48e2396130ad51be0d1ad9a5a5609f","sha256:6f8b133163a93a5ae242e52bd3538e8fd2b8ca0383533d660107dbeca1f5ef66"],"state_sha256":"494cfff8e5e51cb4292cf970ef8484ba32ff7c8d0e570f5d53aeb1b349e465f8"}