{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2007:UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE","short_pith_number":"pith:UVPIN7K5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a55e86fd5d43c6410a2ba199845013111aab84480d37d2a9783710dc1a0740d3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0710.5327","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Escalating The War On SPAM Through Practical POW Exchange","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.NI","authors_text":"Paul Gardner-Stephen","submitted_at":"2007-10-29T02:01:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Proof-of-work (POW) schemes have been proposed in the past. One prominent system is HASHCASH (Back, 2002) which uses cryptographic puzzles . However, work by Laurie and Clayton (2004) has shown that for a uniform proof-of-work scheme on email to have an impact on SPAM, it would also be onerous enough to impact on senders of \"legitimate\" email. I suggest that a non-uniform proof-of-work scheme on email may be a solution to this problem, and describe a framework that has the potential to limit SPAM, without unduly penalising legitimate senders, and is constructed using only current SPAM filter t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0710.5327","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"cs.NI","submitted_at":"2007-10-29T02:01:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"ec850cc212e9c771460ccd405e0cc55acf80ccc667da1e2ce1ac484485dcba4d","abstract_canon_sha256":"c0c769231c175d3fd3cf37177eee7fc67fcfadc7feb5bc044e150fac67f19352"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.815454Z","signature_b64":"nqt7T88sH9D3hi2LVqERy5U68I1Hc8yAHM8HBVVhIqF/R0HBDOPdbz5U7hd2aDEmzQ1u8hz212pEwr9XExCjDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a55e86fd5d43c6410a2ba199845013111aab84480d37d2a9783710dc1a0740d3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.814988Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.814988Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Escalating The War On SPAM Through Practical POW Exchange","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.NI","authors_text":"Paul Gardner-Stephen","submitted_at":"2007-10-29T02:01:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Proof-of-work (POW) schemes have been proposed in the past. One prominent system is HASHCASH (Back, 2002) which uses cryptographic puzzles . However, work by Laurie and Clayton (2004) has shown that for a uniform proof-of-work scheme on email to have an impact on SPAM, it would also be onerous enough to impact on senders of \"legitimate\" email. I suggest that a non-uniform proof-of-work scheme on email may be a solution to this problem, and describe a framework that has the potential to limit SPAM, without unduly penalising legitimate senders, and is constructed using only current SPAM filter t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0710.5327","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0710.5327","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.815052+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0710.5327v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.815052+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0710.5327","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.815052+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UVPIN7K5IPDE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:56.245647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UVPIN7K5IPDECCRL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:56.245647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UVPIN7K5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:56.245647+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UVPIN7K5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UVPIN7K5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0710.5327&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UVPIN7K5IPDECCRLUGMYIUATCE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.815052+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:58:48.815052+00:00"}