{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW","short_pith_number":"pith:UWCG665A","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a5846f7ba06edd40a8e48d443dce8a25b60f1c78a7b6b61d6ea4e8851d781488","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.09193","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"(Ir)rationality and Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Mirco Musolesi, Olivia Macmillan-Scott","submitted_at":"2024-02-14T14:17:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Do large language models (LLMs) display rational reasoning? LLMs have been shown to contain human biases due to the data they have been trained on; whether this is reflected in rational reasoning remains less clear. In this paper, we answer this question by evaluating seven language models using tasks from the cognitive psychology literature. We find that, like humans, LLMs display irrationality in these tasks. However, the way this irrationality is displayed does not reflect that shown by humans. When incorrect answers are given by LLMs to these tasks, they are often incorrect in ways that di"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.09193","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-14T14:17:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"c87a083f1f314fe92d9001bc56876b9dc95c9e5f168aa71beed9653147d08a2e","abstract_canon_sha256":"f242eb1f31ee47d2c531f074e274e05505197aaa94b841c97f3b6941a72c052c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.091713Z","signature_b64":"ujQbNO73OKZfveAgvSgAw9+1zLdQd7A8gxEAl6JfVO7WK1fFzQKv67RjlyUEGHby84IWbSsgi4uuTQYlPfv5Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a5846f7ba06edd40a8e48d443dce8a25b60f1c78a7b6b61d6ea4e8851d781488","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090719Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090719Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"(Ir)rationality and Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Mirco Musolesi, Olivia Macmillan-Scott","submitted_at":"2024-02-14T14:17:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Do large language models (LLMs) display rational reasoning? LLMs have been shown to contain human biases due to the data they have been trained on; whether this is reflected in rational reasoning remains less clear. In this paper, we answer this question by evaluating seven language models using tasks from the cognitive psychology literature. We find that, like humans, LLMs display irrationality in these tasks. However, the way this irrationality is displayed does not reflect that shown by humans. When incorrect answers are given by LLMs to these tasks, they are often incorrect in ways that di"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.09193","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.09193/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.09193","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.09193v2","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.09193","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UWCG665AN3OU","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UWCG665AN3OUBKHE","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UWCG665A","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30587","citing_title":"Words Speak Louder Than Code: Investigating Cognitive Heuristics in LLM-Based Code Vulnerability Detection","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UWCG665A"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UWCG665A","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.09193&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UWCG665AN3OUBKHERVCD3TUKEW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-09T02:08:26.090858+00:00"}