{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2007:VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM","short_pith_number":"pith:VBUHBGDY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a86870987882c0f632b9619e8f9873930f6b0ee454418b2155613dfef81111f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0712.1232","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparison of Standard Ruler and Standard Candle constraints on Dark Energy Models","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph","authors_text":"L. Perivolaropoulos, R. Lazkoz, S. Nesseris","submitted_at":"2007-12-08T07:52:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare the dark energy model constraints obtained by using recent standard ruler data (Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) at z=0.2 and z=0.35 and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) shift parameters R and l_a) with the corresponding constraints obtained by using recent Type Ia Supernovae (SnIa) standard candle data (ESSENCE+SNLS+HST from Davis et. al.). We find that, even though both classes of data are consistent with LCDM at the 2\\sigma level, there is a systematic difference between the two classes of data. In particular, we find that for practically all values of the parameters (\\Omega_0"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0712.1232","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"astro-ph","submitted_at":"2007-12-08T07:52:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"293246ce23faae84d1165113f8e89ef7f445b9e707dc5c59c300f4cf4bd05890","abstract_canon_sha256":"f930fda254186ef02738905dab4770c7d96f03cbe06827f5bb98c22fcf7589c1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235596Z","signature_b64":"bouza9YL+ipTmfa4DPCmM7Xj7Ce5fO1DU9VKG8aURCHx9qr1VnTxgQJDjQFa0GAdVEhdVDWufnGuaDzarVn9DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a86870987882c0f632b9619e8f9873930f6b0ee454418b2155613dfef81111f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235207Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235207Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparison of Standard Ruler and Standard Candle constraints on Dark Energy Models","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph","authors_text":"L. Perivolaropoulos, R. Lazkoz, S. Nesseris","submitted_at":"2007-12-08T07:52:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare the dark energy model constraints obtained by using recent standard ruler data (Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) at z=0.2 and z=0.35 and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) shift parameters R and l_a) with the corresponding constraints obtained by using recent Type Ia Supernovae (SnIa) standard candle data (ESSENCE+SNLS+HST from Davis et. al.). We find that, even though both classes of data are consistent with LCDM at the 2\\sigma level, there is a systematic difference between the two classes of data. In particular, we find that for practically all values of the parameters (\\Omega_0"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0712.1232","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/0712.1232/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0712.1232","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0712.1232v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0712.1232","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VBUHBGDYQLAP","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZ","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VBUHBGDY","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08654","citing_title":"Can Distance Duality Violation Save Late-time Solutions to the Hubble Tension?","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VBUHBGDY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VBUHBGDY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0712.1232&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VBUHBGDYQLAPMMVZMGPI7GDTSM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:43:04.235268+00:00"}