{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5","short_pith_number":"pith:VMNEN42U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ab1a46f354f2c5587e958977c2e9383772414e4843049b2652b915767c8bf753","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.14285","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Stochastic interventions, sensitivity analysis, and optimal transport","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Alec McClean, Alexander W. Levis, Edward H. Kennedy, Larry Wasserman, Sivaraman Balakrishnan","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T16:35:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent methodological research in causal inference has focused on effects of stochastic interventions, which assign treatment randomly, often according to subject-specific covariates. In this work, we demonstrate that the usual notion of stochastic interventions have a surprising property: when there is unmeasured confounding, bounds on their effects do not collapse when the policy approaches the observational regime. As an alternative, we propose to study generalized policies, treatment rules that can depend on covariates, the natural value of treatment, and auxiliary randomness. We show that"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.14285","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T16:35:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"7677b94376789962a0d84accebc983d776ddfac3b164e20c69f0456c3409f0e4","abstract_canon_sha256":"a0e876883540c98c25cd97f1f57368dad1134f94a474fbb0d55ec64a4601014d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.762021Z","signature_b64":"e+tpBlNixeDSJ9ifGSwQtm3UHua+x7ui7xRl8LYyjSdmz14uRspsx26uPZUz89Noikt/7M4oHeiY4K35sN0fBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ab1a46f354f2c5587e958977c2e9383772414e4843049b2652b915767c8bf753","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761644Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761644Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Stochastic interventions, sensitivity analysis, and optimal transport","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Alec McClean, Alexander W. Levis, Edward H. Kennedy, Larry Wasserman, Sivaraman Balakrishnan","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T16:35:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent methodological research in causal inference has focused on effects of stochastic interventions, which assign treatment randomly, often according to subject-specific covariates. In this work, we demonstrate that the usual notion of stochastic interventions have a surprising property: when there is unmeasured confounding, bounds on their effects do not collapse when the policy approaches the observational regime. As an alternative, we propose to study generalized policies, treatment rules that can depend on covariates, the natural value of treatment, and auxiliary randomness. We show that"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.14285","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.14285/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.14285","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.14285v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.14285","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VMNEN42U6LCV","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UV","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VMNEN42U","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27518","citing_title":"Causal Inference for Functional Treatments with Stochastic Policies","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VMNEN42U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VMNEN42U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.14285&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VMNEN42U6LCVQ7UVRF34F2JYG5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:38:44.761699+00:00"}